Shame about no *sync on it. But I will celebrate the fact that the game is on with OLED and >60 at 4K.
If you can afford a $5k display, you might be able to work around some of those framerate issues with overclocked quad GP100 under water.
Shame about no *sync on it. But I will celebrate the fact that the game is on with OLED and >60 at 4K.
It looks incredible, but 4K monitors are going to be the ultimate frustration for enthusiasts under the new DP standards. You can have 120hz or HDR, but not both at the same time. That suuuuuuucks. Also, Adam, why did you even mention the price anyway? I fully expected you to say nothing other than your typical comment of, "I'll take 4 please" One for each Titan X is the only legit way to go.
Four? If you get six, you could do a 3x2 panel curved all around. With the thinness of that bezel, it'd be just about perfect. Really, $30k is a steal.
This is the biggest PC news in 10 years, even better than VRR. This is the beginning of the end for the LCD monopoly on consumer monitors.
O_O I'm in for a grand. Won't take long for OLED to take over and come down.
Damn you, now you got me to reconsider my plan to upgrde my U2412M!BTW: the price trajectory of 4K displays is probably a good example of where things are headed. Sharp's 30" 4K LCD started at around $5K, and just a year later, we had offerings show up in the low $1K range.
I hope other brands use the same panel. That will drive prices down. I'm not much of a Dell monitor fan anyway.
No DP1.3? Well I guess we can forget about native 4K 120Hz. 60Hz w/frame doubling.
Isn't USB-C enough to drive 4K @ 120Hz? Unsure if it's enough for that resolution, rate, and HDR though.
If it can't do 4k, 120Hz and HDR there's no way I would be dropping 5k on it. If so, perhaps...depending.