Originally posted by: gpgofast
We just bought two of these monitors at work and DVI is MUCH sharper. You will notice a significant improvement in text sharpness on screen. I also have a Dell 1905 Ultrasharp and the text sharpness difference is quite extreme. It is definitely worth going DVI with an LCD in my experience. GP
Correct.
By using VGA on a DIGITAL Display you start with a digital signal then convert it to analog where it is then subjected to emf and line noise, then once it reaches the monitor it is then reconverted back to digital and the image quality suffers as a result of the lost information and interferance. With DVI it is kept digital all the way down to the last pixel.
When a digital display* recieves a digital signal each pixel comes with a description of where it is located and what exact colour it should be. But if the Digital Display recieves an analog signal it treats it differantly than a CRT would. The CRT will display analogue as it recieves the information. A digital fixed resolution monitor will have to "guess" the information of where each pixel needs to be and what colour it might be. This is not very accurate and leads to poor image quality.
With CRT's being analong displays there is no need for DVI since the Analog signal is the only kind of signal it can display.
To sum it up- If you have a digital display use a digital signal. If you have an analogue display it will work only on analogue signaling even if the source is digital.
*any display with a fixed resolution like LCD, LCoS, Plasma, DLP, ETC is a digital display.