• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Decoding Mr. Bush's Denials

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: BBond
The most ridiculous part of the right wing's argument is, in 1998, while President Clinton was taking care of business bombing the hell out of Saddam's SUSPECTED WMD, they were all screaming at the top of their lungs, "WAG THE DOG"!!!

Now, after they're boy has unnecessarily and totally fvcked up the entire Middle East, they're all using Clinton's actions as an excuse for Bush's mistakes.

:roll:

Ridiculous.

Still trying to get past Carters giving away the Panama canal! What a Dimocratic fux up that was!

 
Originally posted by: jackschmittusa
I take special note that both condor and pabster made no attempt to address any of the points in the article. Understandable I guess, as this Administrations actions are indefensable.

I wonder how long they think that just pasting a "liberal" label on what they don't like will make these things go away.



:thumbsup:
 
Originally posted by: wirelessenabled
Originally posted by: jackschmittusa
I take special note that both condor and pabster made no attempt to address any of the points in the article. Understandable I guess, as this Administrations actions are indefensable.

I wonder how long they think that just pasting a "liberal" label on what they don't like will make these things go away.



:thumbsup:

Addressing points posted by liberals is a complete waste of time here. Why would we waste that effort? Of the posters who do honestly address the points presented by liberals with soundly thought out postings, how many actually get anything but hate for their efforts? Then, a day of so later, the same liberal brings up the same sales pitch in the same context like no one has refuted it and bates yet another new poster into a sea of pointless, inaccurate detail. How many times is one expected to play that game? I usually avoid threads that are so obviously liberal circle jerks. I was just bored this time. Still am!

 
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: wirelessenabled
Originally posted by: jackschmittusa
I take special note that both condor and pabster made no attempt to address any of the points in the article. Understandable I guess, as this Administrations actions are indefensable.

I wonder how long they think that just pasting a "liberal" label on what they don't like will make these things go away.



:thumbsup:

Addressing points posted by liberals is a complete waste of time here. Why would we waste that effort? Of the posters who do honestly address the points presented by liberals with soundly thought out postings, how many actually get anything but hate for their efforts? Then, a day of so later, the same liberal brings up the same sales pitch in the same context like no one has refuted it and bates yet another new poster into a sea of pointless, inaccurate detail. How many times is one expected to play that game? I usually avoid threads that are so obviously liberal circle jerks. I was just bored this time. Still am!

so.. trolling it is?
 
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: wirelessenabled
Originally posted by: jackschmittusa
I take special note that both condor and pabster made no attempt to address any of the points in the article. Understandable I guess, as this Administrations actions are indefensable.

I wonder how long they think that just pasting a "liberal" label on what they don't like will make these things go away.



:thumbsup:

Addressing points posted by liberals is a complete waste of time here. Why would we waste that effort? Of the posters who do honestly address the points presented by liberals with soundly thought out postings, how many actually get anything but hate for their efforts? Then, a day of so later, the same liberal brings up the same sales pitch in the same context like no one has refuted it and bates yet another new poster into a sea of pointless, inaccurate detail. How many times is one expected to play that game? I usually avoid threads that are so obviously liberal circle jerks. I was just bored this time. Still am!

wow, what an incredibly hypocritical and close-minded opinion. don't expect any better from you though, but at least you openly admit your a troll.
 
Originally posted by: Sudheer Anne
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: wirelessenabled
Originally posted by: jackschmittusa
I take special note that both condor and pabster made no attempt to address any of the points in the article. Understandable I guess, as this Administrations actions are indefensable.

I wonder how long they think that just pasting a "liberal" label on what they don't like will make these things go away.



:thumbsup:

Addressing points posted by liberals is a complete waste of time here. Why would we waste that effort? Of the posters who do honestly address the points presented by liberals with soundly thought out postings, how many actually get anything but hate for their efforts? Then, a day of so later, the same liberal brings up the same sales pitch in the same context like no one has refuted it and bates yet another new poster into a sea of pointless, inaccurate detail. How many times is one expected to play that game? I usually avoid threads that are so obviously liberal circle jerks. I was just bored this time. Still am!

wow, what an incredibly hypocritical and close-minded opinion. don't expect any better from you though, but at least you openly admit your a troll.

Did you ever figure out the 214?

 
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: Titan
Originally posted by: BBond
I find Bush's latest propaganda campaign to be as offensive to the American people as was his propaganda campaign to conduct his unprovoked and disastrous invasion of Iraq. Does this lout actually believe the American people are stupid enough to fall for his regurgitated nonsense?

Yes. We fell for everything else, didn't we. God help us if he suceeds again though.

Bush is in a panic over America finally beginning to wake up to the truth about his myriad failures and outright lies and that's the reason behind this latest propaganda campaign. He's and his party are frantic to reverse their political fortunes. Bush is frantic over the fact that members of his own party have lost elections because he gave the "support". Bush is frantic because a majority of Americans will vote AGAINST candidates the Bush endorses.

Bush is a political millstone around the neck of the Republican Party.

If Bush succeeds in fooling America again then America will be deserving of the results.

Actually, Bush may be the best thing that's happened to the Republican party in awhile. He is such a colossal fool that hopefully a more moderate republican party will emerge from this and the fringe element will be relegated back to where they belong...on the outside looking in.
 
Back
Top