• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Decided to update an old core size comparison

CatMerc

Golden Member
Been working on this on and off for the past two days, I really like this. Visualizes quite nicely the various cores on the market. Also added a Piledriver module for kicks.
Y7ry7i7.jpg
2IhKynh.jpg

If you have a die shot of a certain SoC and a die size of said SoC, I can add more cores 🙂
 
Last edited:
CofeeLake might be bigger than KabyLake due to 14++.
IIRC they backported single dummy gate from 10nm in order to offset the change in CPP.

I didn't measure it but I've heard the cores are more or less the same.
 
dozer module should be 31mm2 (I think this includes L1 and L2 but not L3), so effectively 16mm2 core. steamroller added to area and power consumption by doubling up on decoders, but also shrank to 28nm. So guessing steamroller and excavator are roughly 15mm2 a core or (30mm2 a module). I really want to see a an x86 big little config extending stoney with a pair of puma cores--which should only add ballpark 7mm2. (amazing how tiny these are; 3mm2 at 28nm).
 
Back
Top