Once again I find myself coming here and being overwhelmed with how much Linux has changed since last summer, when I last played with it.
I set up a testing server here at work (small office) for web development pre-deployments. He ran at runlevel3 and simply acted as a testing platform for my web pages before I took them live. That computer died a peaceful death, possibly from a stroke (motherboard failure). I am in need of setting up a new one and I want to do it right. While it's primary goal is a testing server (and by server, I mean being used by no more than two people at any given time), I would like to explore the linux world with it.
My three main versions that I am considering are Mandrake 9.1, Debian (testing sarge, 3.0rc1 seems dated) and Gentoo 1.4rc4. Here is what my personal pros/cons of each are. Let me know if this is more or less an accurate representation of what actually is.
Mandrake:
PROS: Very simple to install. I'd be installing a relatively new yet stable version. Extensive Mandrake-specific applications help and make it the easiest install with the best hardware detection.
CONS: Uses RPM packages. I have been under the assumption that RPMS are dated and a huge pain in the ass to use, given the liklihood of dependency errors.
Debian:
PROS: APT-GET makes package management extremely easy. Would probably be the leanest version, and thus implicity the most responsive.
CONS: I'd be installing a testing version, and not the latest stable version. I'd have to spend more time on the install. The testing sarge doesn't have some of the more recent packages that Mandrake 9.1 has. Probably not the most stable.
Gentoo:
PROS: very easy to keep up to date.
CONS: I don't know Linux all that well and it might take more time to learn than the other two. I'd have to compile everything so it'd probably be pretty slow to set up.
Is anything I am assuming incorrect?
I set up a testing server here at work (small office) for web development pre-deployments. He ran at runlevel3 and simply acted as a testing platform for my web pages before I took them live. That computer died a peaceful death, possibly from a stroke (motherboard failure). I am in need of setting up a new one and I want to do it right. While it's primary goal is a testing server (and by server, I mean being used by no more than two people at any given time), I would like to explore the linux world with it.
My three main versions that I am considering are Mandrake 9.1, Debian (testing sarge, 3.0rc1 seems dated) and Gentoo 1.4rc4. Here is what my personal pros/cons of each are. Let me know if this is more or less an accurate representation of what actually is.
Mandrake:
PROS: Very simple to install. I'd be installing a relatively new yet stable version. Extensive Mandrake-specific applications help and make it the easiest install with the best hardware detection.
CONS: Uses RPM packages. I have been under the assumption that RPMS are dated and a huge pain in the ass to use, given the liklihood of dependency errors.
Debian:
PROS: APT-GET makes package management extremely easy. Would probably be the leanest version, and thus implicity the most responsive.
CONS: I'd be installing a testing version, and not the latest stable version. I'd have to spend more time on the install. The testing sarge doesn't have some of the more recent packages that Mandrake 9.1 has. Probably not the most stable.
Gentoo:
PROS: very easy to keep up to date.
CONS: I don't know Linux all that well and it might take more time to learn than the other two. I'd have to compile everything so it'd probably be pretty slow to set up.
Is anything I am assuming incorrect?