You posted before you could read the info I posted about his motive.
I think the author of the OP's article, and the journalist referred therein are basically asking "if McVeigh went to war with the US gov, who went with him"?
To claim that we may not know the whole story is not the same as claiming there is a conspiracy. To suggest otherwise, as some here do, is absurd.
Is the below from the article refutable or disproven?
If not, there are reasonable questions to asked and answered.
Edit: About your militia question. My impression is no. He seemed more 'lone wolf' and wanderer. No militia group was 'waco'd' after his bombing. If he had been in a militia I believe they would've been targeted by the gov.
Fern
I think no militia group was targeted because damn near everyone in Elohim City was a paid informant - including Father Randy Millar, their leader. My impression of the Iraq connection was that it was rather tenuous. It was significant that McVeigh was so often reported as being accompanied by a swarthy Middle Easterner (don't know why people insist that Iraqis are brown) but clearly the government investigators from day one were determined not to follow up that lead. That tells me they knew who this man was, and it would have been embarrassing for his identity to be revealed, probably because he was a paid informant for the FBI, BATFE, Treasury, etc. And that argues pretty significantly that the swarthy Middle Easterner was not a known Iraqi agent; I can't imagine a government law enforcement bureaucracy covering up an act of war like that.
Also, the FBI memo doesn't really allege that Muslims did the OC bombing, merely that they provided McVeigh technical expertise. Certainly McVeigh hated the US government enough to accept expertise from anyone, but I'd be surprised if Elohim City could not furnish enough expertise in explosives to pull it off without an Iraqi agent involved. In the absence of hard evidence to the contrary, Occam's razor suggests that Iraqi involvement is rather unlikely.