• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

debate here about sex0r

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
like people said, the length depends......but i'll tell you this, 2 hours is for fukcing n00bs.. ask any girl and they'll tell you that 2 hours is a piece of sh!t. it starts to hurt, burn, feel uncomfortable, and generally unenjoyable. you can give a girl 2-3 orgasms in less than 20 minutes. there's no need to go non-stop for 2 hours. and who the hell wants to? the payoff for the guy is the end, so give your girl some pleasure and be done. maybe get a second a third sessions later on, but 2 hours straight is just idiotic.




=|
 
Originally posted by: theNEOone
like people said, the length depends......but i'll tell you this, 2 hours is for fukcing n00bs.. ask any girl and they'll tell you that 2 hours is a piece of sh!t. it starts to hurt, burn, feel uncomfortable, and generally unenjoyable. you can give a girl 2-3 orgasms in less than 20 minutes. there's no need to go non-stop for 2 hours. and who the hell wants to? the payoff for the guy is the end, so give your girl some pleasure and be done. maybe get a second a third sessions later on, but 2 hours straight is just idiotic.




=|
Someones never had sex.
 
I don't think 2 hours is a n00bish length. I had been dating the girl for a year so I wasn't going to explode if she touched me on the arm or anything like that. We had to stop because it was getting uncomfortable, so I will agree with that. However, your "you can give a girl 2-3 orgasms in less than 20 minutes" comment makes you sound a little inexperienced. Anyways, back on topic, how I got to 2 hours: you just keep going and you try and try to hold it, and eventually you reach this plateau wherein no amount of time past that will you be able to blow your load.

Originally posted by: theNEOone
like people said, the length depends......but i'll tell you this, 2 hours is for fukcing n00bs.. ask any girl and they'll tell you that 2 hours is a piece of sh!t. it starts to hurt, burn, feel uncomfortable, and generally unenjoyable. you can give a girl 2-3 orgasms in less than 20 minutes. there's no need to go non-stop for 2 hours. and who the hell wants to? the payoff for the guy is the end, so give your girl some pleasure and be done. maybe get a second a third sessions later on, but 2 hours straight is just idiotic.




=|

 
The perfect amont of time is 25-40 minutes. That way the girl doesn't get hurt and its an enjoyable experience together. Just take my advice. You can get plenty of orgasms in this time.
 
Originally posted by: DumbGuy
how long do people ususally last during sex? how long does the average couple have sex for?

😱

Do you mean intercourse or the whole process?

It has been my experience with the women I've known that my hands and tongue meant as much to them as anything else. If you know what I mean. As a woman once told me when I was 17: "Take care of the outside first".
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Someones never had sex.
i've been fukcing since i was 15, an average of once a day. i'm 21 now so you do the goddamn math. ask most girls (ones that are experienced, not your high school kiddies)....they can have multiple organisms in a 30 minute period, and if they had the option to have sex for 2 hours straight, they'd pass.




=|
 
Yeah, a lot of you fellow Anandtechers think that girls like to go for 2 hours or so, but they don't! If you ever get a girl, you'll see that they'd rather have it more steady, but at a decent pace also. Just my 50 cents
 
Originally posted by: BigPoppa
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
Does it count if you finish, and take a break for a few minutes and go at it again?

<Mills Lane> I'll allow it! </Mills Lane>

Ok... then in that case, it was long enough to watch the sun set, and then rise.
 
Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: Eli
Someones never had sex.
i've been fukcing since i was 15, an average of once a day. i'm 21 now so you do the goddamn math. ask most girls (ones that are experienced, not your high school kiddies)....they can have multiple organisms in a 30 minute period, and if they had the option to have sex for 2 hours straight, they'd pass.




=|

Yeah there's some BS
rolleye.gif
rolleye.gif
rolleye.gif
rolleye.gif
rolleye.gif
rolleye.gif
rolleye.gif
rolleye.gif
rolleye.gif
rolleye.gif
rolleye.gif

 
4 days for me. 2 days to get ready 14 seconds to get done and 2 days to recover.

the price of being old.

Bleep
 
Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: Eli
Someones never had sex.
ask most girls (ones that are experienced, not your high school kiddies)....they can have multiple organisms in a 30 minute period, and if they had the option to have sex for 2 hours straight, they'd pass. =|

I concur.
 
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: Eli
Someones never had sex.
ask most girls (ones that are experienced, not your high school kiddies)....they can have multiple organisms in a 30 minute period, and if they had the option to have sex for 2 hours straight, they'd pass. =|

I concur.
Are you agreeing with him, or me?

I did not mean hard rough intercourse for 2 hours. That's just silly, it wouldn't last 2 hours in that circumstance anyway.

I still think he doesen't know what he's talking about, though. There is nothing wrong with some nice slow sex that lasts a very long time. It's all mental, you and your partner can put it off as long as you want, it just makes it that much better when the time does come.

I think it's obvious that he's either inexperienced, or has never actually had sex. While I agree that they could have multiple orgasms in a 30 minute period, that is not the point. I say if they had the option of sex for 2 hours, vs, 2 minutes, they would take the former.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: Eli
Someones never had sex.
ask most girls (ones that are experienced, not your high school kiddies)....they can have multiple organisms in a 30 minute period, and if they had the option to have sex for 2 hours straight, they'd pass. =|

I concur.
Are you agreeing with him, or me?

I did not mean hard rough intercourse for 2 hours. That's just silly, it wouldn't last 2 hours in that circumstance anyway.

I still think he doesen't know what he's talking about, though. There is nothing wrong with some nice slow sex that lasts a very long time. It's all mental, you and your partner can put it off as long as you want, it just makes it that much better when the time does come.

I think it's obvious that he's either inexperienced, or has never actually had sex. While I agree that they could have multiple orgasms in a 30 minute period, that is not the point. I say if they had the option of sex for 2 hours, vs, 2 minutes, they would take the former.


I was agreeing with him. You have since clarified what you meant by 2 hours and now I agree with you both. 2 hours of continous sex = friction burn. :Q
 
Some girls like it dusk till dawn, some like it quick and dirty, some like it somwhere inbetween.

And never underestimate the power of lube for a long session...
 
Back
Top