Originally posted by: Skoorb
I never support the death penalty. I also believe some people can change, so I went with the third option.
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
how did he commit murder?
did he throw these dudes into the fire?
If you are a drunk driver and kill someone are you a murder?
If you are speeding and kill someone are you a murder??
If you are talking on the cell phone while driving and kill someone are you a murder??
Where do you stop?
Originally posted by: ZeGermans
It's felony murder, which is a nice little clause that helps white people execute black people
Originally posted by: NeoV
PJ - your analogies are all wrong - although I'd argue that if you are drunk and you hit someone and kill them it should be a felony as well - but this guy intentionally lit fires - it's logical to think that some of these fires - given conditions in CA - would become very large and dangerous fires, and in fact could be dangerous to people living nearby or trying to fight the fire.
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: ZeGermans
It's felony murder, which is a nice little clause that helps white people execute black people
Come on... WTH does race have to do with this?
That's why only parole if he truly has changed beyond any reasonable doubt. Otherwise, if in doubt, prison bars.Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I never support the death penalty. I also believe some people can change, so I went with the third option.
Me neither, but I doubt most people can or wish to change, so I'm happy keeping this idiot locked away for the rest of his natural days.
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
this is manslaughter tops, certainly not a death penalty case by any means.
Originally posted by: ericlp
Kill the MoFo. Tax Payers won't have to foot the bill for life in prison.
Let's air the this on national television. You know... Make an example to assholes that want to burn down your house and possible kill you...
I think we should go one step further. Feed him to the lions.
EDIT...
That is what is wrong with the USA today.
We are TOO SOFT on criminals. PJ just wants to slap him on his wrist and set him free to spark up some more fires.
I guess I'm pretty harsh on this because I think people should lose a finger for stealing ... I was a corrections officer and when you've seen all the BS that happens in american prison system you'd be outraged as well. It's a shame and a joke that needs to be fixed --- We need to start PUNISHING people for the crimes they do.
Yes, he knows that is what firefighters do.Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
OK with me :thumbsup:
He is not an "arsonist" he is a murderer. That is what he is getting the death penalty for. Not really anything the Supreme Court can do.
Your thread title is dishonest.
how did he commit murder? Yes.
did he throw these dudes into the fire?
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Why is the title dishonest??
It is nearly quoted word for word from the link.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Why is the title dishonest??
It is nearly quoted word for word from the link.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
If the judge agrees with the jury then this seems like a perfect case to take to the Supreme Court.
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
OK with me :thumbsup:
He is not an "arsonist" he is a murderer. That is what he is getting the death penalty for. Not really anything the Supreme Court can do.
Your thread title is dishonest.
how did he commit murder?
did he throw these dudes into the fire?
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
If you are a drunk driver and kill someone are you a murder?
If you are speeding and kill someone are you a murder??
If you are talking on the cell phone while driving and kill someone are you a murder??
Where do you stop?
Show me that his goal was to kill people, or that there was a reasonable expectation that someone might die via the fire THEN I might agree with you. But so far all I see is a guy who started a fire that killed some one.
