Dear Leader wants equal time

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
I hope to fuck not.

Well, no one said they'd be positive books about Trump, or that they would reflect a long time in office. I imagine they'll be autopsies: how the hell did the US elect such an incompetent leader, how much damage did he do while he was in office, how much did he hurt the Republican party's prospects (or force reforms)... and of course, the inevitable insider books revealing the corruption and infighting that even the leakers haven't mentioned yet.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136
A hundred years from now we're gonna have WAY more books on Trump than on Hitler.

Assuming he does not start a nuclear war or directly lead to the collapse of the USA, I doubt. He will be remembered as an aberration, evidence of a brief time period when voters around the world went batshit crazy.

I truly hope my future descendants say who was Trump? If he fades into the past like a Benjamin Harrison or Grover Cleveland I will be relieved.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,452
136
Assuming he does not start a nuclear war or directly lead to the collapse of the USA, I doubt. He will be remembered as an aberration, evidence of a brief time period when voters around the world went batshit crazy.

I truly hope my future descendants say who was Trump? If he fades into the past like a Benjamin Harrison or Grover Cleveland I will be relieved.
Uttered in the same breath as Fillmore, Hayes, Arthur, etc.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,763
10,066
136
And what does he mean by equal time. They talk about him constantly. Does he think they should be fluffing him half the time?
Absolutely yes he does.
Yeah that was rhetorical. It was more to highlight the underlying premise which is chilling if you think about it.

Trump is a big authoritarian, but lest you forget Democrats have also considered it.
P&N is not a stranger to the subject.
FCC to Monitor News Rooms
Who needs to go to Russia when President Obama is bringing Russia here, complete with the war on journalists?

The return of the Fairness Doctrine - sorry, this totally fair and impartial CIN study - is being led by Mignon Clyburn, daughter of Representative James Clyburn. Just to make sure it's fair and impartial, of course.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/new-o...s-first-amendment-protections/article/2544363


So just to wrap it up, the FCC without a vote, or a debate, or even bothering to tell the other commissioners gives out a no-bid contract to Social Solutions International (whose principle accomplishment has been to use President Obama's reign to firmly lock its corporate jaws onto Uncle Sugar's teat) to go into every news agency* to study "perceived station bias, perceived percent of news dedicated to each of the eight CINs, and perceived responsiveness to underserved populations", led by the child of a powerful Democrat House member whose own great accomplishment is getting the FCC to lower the price of prison phone calls. 'Cause the FCC is looking out for the little guy. Assuming he's in prison anyway.

*Including newspapers which aren't even with the FCC's jurisdiction - but hey, when you're ready to rule you can't be inconvenienced by silly little laws.

Evidently Obama's plan to reboot our relationship with Russia is to make America a more authoritarian, one party nation, thereby making Russia look good so hopefully they'll like us and want to braid our hair.

Why do you think they got rid of the "fairness doctrine"?

I have a slightly different takes here, there is some wisdom to the fairness doctrine but it somewhat presupposes that there are just two sides to any given issue. And to level the playing field, the fair way, present both view points and let the viewing public decide. But when there are three four five or 112 different ways to look at an any given issue, how do you fairly give equal time to all sides especially when some of those alternative ideas are in fact totally nutty. In short,the fairness doctrine on our public airwaves are in actuality a unworkable regulation.

On the downside, we get people like Rush Limbaugh serially abusing the concept of the fairness doctrine. As he thrills his listeners with only his own views, and the only alternate views Rush permits is his alter ego's whipping boy in Snurdly.

As Rush is a poster child of why we need to bring back the fairness doctrine. But still, if we can't regulate things fairly, we will be stuck having many Rush types on the right, the left and all ends of the lunatic fringes.

Fox and Friends airs 4-minute anti-Obama video
Yeah, I saw it. It did look like a campaign ad.

But what's new?

Watch Sean Hannity and it's 60 minutes of all Obama and why you shouldn't vote for him. Then watch Chris Matthews, it's 60 minutes about Romney and why you shouldn't vote for him.

There ARE real news shows out there. But Fox and Friends isn't one. Neither are Matthews or Hannity.

Fern
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Assuming he does not start a nuclear war or directly lead to the collapse of the USA, I doubt. He will be remembered as an aberration, evidence of a brief time period when voters around the world went batshit crazy.

I truly hope my future descendants say who was Trump? If he fades into the past like a Benjamin Harrison or Grover Cleveland I will be relieved.

Probably not. Remember that old sci fi movie, Forbidden Planet? Trump is the monster from the Id of American conservatism...
 
  • Like
Reactions: jman19

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126
Trump and his constant attack on speech he doesn't like and trying to find some legal avenue to suppress it, is one of the best reasons to protect the first amendment even if it means allowing a few racists, Nazis, and bigots to have protests or speak at public universities.
 

WHAMPOM

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
7,628
183
106
In Trump's mind equal time means "more equal" as in Animal Farm more equal.