Dean Aims to Plug 'Hole' in Resume

[Moonbeam]

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: Shanti
Dean / Clark for 2004 !!!

You have to admit, it would be an interesting combination.

It would indeed. A combined IQ orders of magnitude beyond the other side. And they both speak English not Hypnosis and Dumb.

I see elitism still hasn't left your persona.

CkG

Me? I'm a nobody and dumb as Bush.

OK, I'll amend my statement this time

I see elitism is still alive and well.

See, now it isn't dependent on you being in the picture

CkG

My quote's still in the picture so so am I.

To which my statement, althought amended, still refers

CkG

Which means it's still dependent on me being in the picture.

No, the statement is not dependent on you being in the picture. See, that's what a person means when they post- "now it isn't dependent on you being in the picture" But whatever, this silly little game is over, we can continue if you'd like but there are more important things to discuss than your IQ quip and duck

Now back to dean's hole.

CkG

Well take me out of your quote.

 

[xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx]

Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla

Who thought of the idea to spin the blocking of judicial nominees as racism? Its a really good one, and while completely false, I applaud the right wing spinmaster who came up with it. Karl Rove maybe? :beer:

...just my observation...every Hispanic, black, female is shot down by the party of inclusion

 

[MonstaThrilla]

Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx

Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla

Who thought of the idea to spin the blocking of judicial nominees as racism? Its a really good one, and while completely false, I applaud the right wing spinmaster who came up with it. Karl Rove maybe? :beer:

...just my observation...every Hispanic, black, female is shot down by the party of inclusion

Oh please. That's not your observation. Republican senators were saying the same exact thing months ago.

 

[Crazee]

Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx

Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla

Who thought of the idea to spin the blocking of judicial nominees as racism? Its a really good one, and while completely false, I applaud the right wing spinmaster who came up with it. Karl Rove maybe? :beer:

...just my observation...every Hispanic, black, female is shot down by the party of inclusion

Actually every NeoCon nutbag who would follow their own agenda rather than the constitution has been shot down. Too bad they didn't do it with Ashcroft.

 

[Genesys]

Originally posted by: Crazee

Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx

Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla

Who thought of the idea to spin the blocking of judicial nominees as racism? Its a really good one, and while completely false, I applaud the right wing spinmaster who came up with it. Karl Rove maybe? :beer:

...just my observation...every Hispanic, black, female is shot down by the party of inclusion

Actually every NeoCon nutbag who would follow their own agenda rather than the constitution has been shot down. Too bad they didn't do it with Ashcroft.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, from everything ive read on the nominations the dems are blocking it sounds as though they would uphold the constiution rather than promote their own agenda. its not like the liberal scum that are in place now. all they do is change laws to further their own agenda.

perhaps you should read up on the blocked nominees instead of listen to your silly propaganda.

 

[Crazee]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, from everything ive read on the nominations the dems are blocking it sounds as though they would uphold the constiution rather than promote their own agenda. its not like the liberal scum that are in place now. all they do is change laws to further their own agenda.

perhaps you should read up on the blocked nominees instead of listen to your silly propaganda.

First off is it necessary to call people scum. In no way did I insult you or any group. I would hope other NeoCons might be able to convince you how pathetic you make them look when you result to name calling.

As for my reading up on the nominees, I have that is why I don't support them. Perhaps you should read up some more on Ashcroft who said he wasn't going to persue his own agenda and then went after various state's right to die laws when he said in confirmation that he wouldn't.

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: tnitsuj

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: Shanti
Dean / Clark for 2004 !!!

You have to admit, it would be an interesting combination.

It would indeed. A combined IQ orders of magnitude beyond the other side. And they both speak English not Hypnosis and Dumb.

If the other side is so dumb, how come they are in charge???

Because the US is a democracy? Duh!

And didn't GWB have this exact same deficiency before he brought in Powell?

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: tnitsuj

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: Shanti
Dean / Clark for 2004 !!!

You have to admit, it would be an interesting combination.

It would indeed. A combined IQ orders of magnitude beyond the other side. And they both speak English not Hypnosis and Dumb.

If the other side is so dumb, how come they are in charge???

Because the US is a democracy? Duh!

And didn't GWB have this exact same deficiency before he brought in Powell?

Ofcourse he didn't go around saying he'd teach someone a thing or two about defense, now did he?

CkG