DEADLY 6.7 QUAKE ROCKS IRAN

SynthesisI

Banned
May 21, 2003
634
0
0
TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - A severe earthquake hit the historic city of Bam in southeast Iran on Friday, and the regional governor told state media that many people were killed or buried.

Iranian television said the magnitude 6.3 quake leveled about 60 percent of the houses in Bam, 630 miles southeast of the capital, killing many people as they slept. Authorities put out a call for blood donations.

The U.S. Geological Survey reported the quake had a preliminary magnitude of 6.7, capable of causing severe damage, and hit at 5:27 a.m. local time.

"Many people have died," Kerman province Gov. Mohammad Ali Karimi told state media. "Many people are buried under the rubble."

Bam is an ancient city known for its giant medieval citadel and other adobe buildings, some that date back 2,000 years.

State media reported damage in three villages around Bam and said telephone links with the city were severed. Authorities were in contact with the Bam area through radio and satellite phone links.

Authorities have sent numerous rescue workers with helicopters to the area, the official Islamic Republic News Agency reported.

"We are doing everything we can to rescue the injured and unearth the dead," television quoted Karimi as saying.

There were several aftershocks, one of magnitude 5.3, IRNA quoted the geophysics institute of Tehran University as saying.

Earthquakes in the last 25 years have caused thousands of deaths in Iran, which sits on several fault lines. A magnitude 7.7 temblor killed 25,000 in 1978, and a magnitude 6 quake in June, 2002 killed 500 people.

Source
 

SynthesisI

Banned
May 21, 2003
634
0
0
Also of note- this is the same magnitude as the Northridge, CA quake of 1992 that killed at least 50 people... except the Iran quake occured in a third world country with buildings much less capable of widthstanding such a temblor. Pray for the Iranians...
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: SynthesisI
Also of note- this is the same magnitude as the Northridge, CA quake of 1992 that killed at least 50 people... except the Iran quake occured in a third world country with buildings much less capable of widthstanding such a temblor. Pray for the Iranians...

"Hardly any buildings in Iran are built to withstand earthquakes, although the country sits on several major faultlines and temblors are frequent. An earthquake of magnitude 7.3 to 7.7 killed 50,000 people on June 21, 1990"

Yet they have money to play with Uranium?
rolleye.gif
 

SynthesisI

Banned
May 21, 2003
634
0
0
Yep. Your typical third world country run by a dictatorship. I'm saddened to hear the projected death tolls this morning...
 

lozina

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
11,711
8
81
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: SynthesisI
Also of note- this is the same magnitude as the Northridge, CA quake of 1992 that killed at least 50 people... except the Iran quake occured in a third world country with buildings much less capable of widthstanding such a temblor. Pray for the Iranians...

"Hardly any buildings in Iran are built to withstand earthquakes, although the country sits on several major faultlines and temblors are frequent. An earthquake of magnitude 7.3 to 7.7 killed 50,000 people on June 21, 1990"

Yet they have money to play with Uranium?
rolleye.gif

Well, it's not up to the government to build earthquake-proof houses for people. I don't remember the American government giving me a check to go make my house safer in earthquakes.. they'll enforce alot of building codes though on public buildings but the cost falls upon the people.

I can also say, America won't support it's millions of homeless citizens but has money to play with space-based weapons platforms and nuclear missile shields?
rolleye.gif

 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
uhm ... why don't you go to tehran24.com and click on other cities and click on the city where the earthquake took place. This city is thousands of years old. America is hundreds of years old. Iran has a histroy that goes way back making the buildings ancient. This city didn't have tall buildings like Tehran.
 

smashp

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2003
2,443
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: SynthesisI
Also of note- this is the same magnitude as the Northridge, CA quake of 1992 that killed at least 50 people... except the Iran quake occured in a third world country with buildings much less capable of widthstanding such a temblor. Pray for the Iranians...

"Hardly any buildings in Iran are built to withstand earthquakes, although the country sits on several major faultlines and temblors are frequent. An earthquake of magnitude 7.3 to 7.7 killed 50,000 people on June 21, 1990"

Yet they have money to play with Uranium?
rolleye.gif




hey our government Bills Our Great Grandkids the Costs So they can Develop Tiny Small little Harmless Mini-nukes.

no different.



The Reason the country doesnt have Adequate Earthquake protection is due to the lack of need. The only reason we do here is too prevent Finacial Ruin to insurance Companies from a full destruction.

Repairing is cheaper........


We make our Building stronger only to save insurance Companies Money. If there Were No insurance companies (Like in Iran) nobodu here would care either./
 

Homerboy

Lifer
Mar 1, 2000
30,890
5,001
126
The Reason the country doesnt have Adequate Earthquake protection is due to the lack of need. The only reason we do here is too prevent Finacial Ruin to insurance Companies from a full destruction.

Repairing is cheaper........


We make our Building stronger only to save insurance Companies Money. If there Were No insurance companies (Like in Iran) nobodu here would care either./


eh? I coulda sworn that we also build them to save the lives of the people inside them. Or is this a NOTHER conspiracy theory I fell for?
 

smashp

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2003
2,443
0
0
We live in a capitalistic soceity. We only Do Something when there is money to be made or saved.
 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
Why would Iran build earthquake proof buildings in an ancient city? Like I said go look at the pictures and you will not find a building taller than 2 floors.
 

tnitsuj

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
5,446
0
76
That city has buildings in it that are 2000 years old. I don't see them revamping it to be earthquake proof.
 

Homerboy

Lifer
Mar 1, 2000
30,890
5,001
126
Originally posted by: smashp
We live in a capitalistic soceity. We only Do Something when there is money to be made or saved.

Yah that damn Red Cross. EVERYTHING is $ driven.
Enjoy your pessimistic, conspiracy filled life.
 

ReiAyanami

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2002
4,466
0
0
America won't support it's millions of homeless citizens but has money to play with space-based weapons platforms and nuclear missile shields?

america won't support its millions of homeless citizens because it does not have millions of homeless citizens. not even one million. the max levels of homelessness in recent times have been 200-250k [oh and subsidized housing aka Teh Projects, only aggregated crimes among blacks]. u might be thinking of the millions in prison, and i'd rather have them in there [their new home] than on the streets

and c'mon, wouldn't u rather have a space weapon/nuclear missile shield? which is more important for national security.

Edit: link http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A15020-2001Oct30&notFound=true
 

beer

Lifer
Jun 27, 2000
11,169
1
0
ReiAyanami -

Yes, we all know our potential enemies are going to be using ICBMs to attack us with nuclear warheads.

What, you didn't hear? Korean has Titan-class ICBMs now
rolleye.gif
rolleye.gif

 

lozina

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
11,711
8
81
Originally posted by: ReiAyanami
America won't support it's millions of homeless citizens but has money to play with space-based weapons platforms and nuclear missile shields?

america won't support its millions of homeless citizens because it does not have millions of homeless citizens. not even one million. the max levels of homelessness in recent times have been 200-250k [oh and subsidized housing aka Teh Projects, only aggregated crimes among blacks]. u might be thinking of the millions in prison, and i'd rather have them in there [their new home] than on the streets

and c'mon, wouldn't u rather have a space weapon/nuclear missile shield? which is more important for national security.

Edit: link http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A15020-2001Oct30¬Found=true


Source of my millions of homeless comment:

http://www.nationalhomeless.org/numbers.html

If you have an argument with it, please e-mail them
 

ndee

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
12,680
1
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: SynthesisI
Also of note- this is the same magnitude as the Northridge, CA quake of 1992 that killed at least 50 people... except the Iran quake occured in a third world country with buildings much less capable of widthstanding such a temblor. Pray for the Iranians...

"Hardly any buildings in Iran are built to withstand earthquakes, although the country sits on several major faultlines and temblors are frequent. An earthquake of magnitude 7.3 to 7.7 killed 50,000 people on June 21, 1990"

Yet they have money to play with Uranium?
rolleye.gif

STFU, now would you? There are 20'000 people killed and you come up with that Uranium crap? Sheesh. STFU already.
 

Thoreau

Golden Member
Jan 11, 2003
1,441
0
76
Originally posted by: SynthesisI
Also of note- this is the same magnitude as the Northridge, CA quake of 1992 that killed at least 50 people... except the Iran quake occured in a third world country with buildings much less capable of widthstanding such a temblor. Pray for the Iranians...

That's actually not much stronger than the one that hit Cali the other day.
 

ReiAyanami

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2002
4,466
0
0
according to CNN, a 6.7 has twice the power of a 6.5 (san ramon) earthquake right? cuz its logarithmic and all. nonetheless it makes your think what will happen if "the big one" hits SoCal, LA will become an island or a mountain

we're building multi-million dollar homes on our graves?

maybe this is why Bush is attacking the enviroment, its a pre-emptive strike against the terrorist known as mother earth, she plans on hitting LA within the next 30,000 years...
 

Thoreau

Golden Member
Jan 11, 2003
1,441
0
76
Originally posted by: ReiAyanami
according to CNN, a 6.7 has twice the power of a 6.5 (san ramon) earthquake right? cuz its logarithmic and all. nonetheless it makes your think what will happen if "the big one" hits SoCal, LA will become an island or a mountain

we're building multi-million dollar homes on our graves?

maybe this is why Bush is attacking the enviroment, its a pre-emptive strike against the terrorist known as mother earth, she plans on hitting LA within the next 30,000 years...

This is ALL Al Queda's doing! Osama plans to demolish other countries in the middle east, then shake California loose from the mainland. Well, on the latter, one could only hope. =)

Edit: I understand that it's logarithmic, but I didn't think it was *that* much of a jump. Of course, I'm a lifeless geek who works for porn, so i'm probably wrong anyway.
 

Drift3r

Guest
Jun 3, 2003
3,572
0
0
Originally posted by: Thoreau
Originally posted by: ReiAyanami
according to CNN, a 6.7 has twice the power of a 6.5 (san ramon) earthquake right? cuz its logarithmic and all. nonetheless it makes your think what will happen if "the big one" hits SoCal, LA will become an island or a mountain

we're building multi-million dollar homes on our graves?

maybe this is why Bush is attacking the enviroment, its a pre-emptive strike against the terrorist known as mother earth, she plans on hitting LA within the next 30,000 years...

This is ALL Al Queda's doing! Osama plans to demolish other countries in the middle east, then shake California loose from the mainland. Well, on the latter, one could only hope. =)

Edit: I understand that it's logarithmic, but I didn't think it was *that* much of a jump. Of course, I'm a lifeless geek who works for porn, so i'm probably wrong anyway.

You are wrong anyways. A 5.0 earthquake is 100 times more powerful then a 4.0. Each point in a earth quake means it was 10 times more powerful then the last point. So this earthquake was about 20 times stronger theone in San Ramon. Also the earthquake that hit California recently was not a bad one in that it occured 5 miles deep underground. Had it occured higher nearer to the surface it would of caused a great deal more damage and deaths.