What SpiderCU said.
75GXP's have had a higher rate of failure, but not the 60GXP/120GXP's. Every freaking harddrive company has failures in their drives. Since IBM got the 75GXP issue, it seems like every IBM drive to fail after that has given it an exponentially worse reputation. Personally, I've owned 2 IBM drives, 60GXP and the (35? GXP), and they've not failed for approximately 3 years.
Of all my friends who had 75GXP's fail was because they had very poor cooling. Even though their cases had adequate air flow, they put their drives stacked on top of each other. Do that to 4+ harddrives, leave them on 24/7, and even the best harddrives will fail.
75GXP's have had a higher rate of failure, but not the 60GXP/120GXP's. Every freaking harddrive company has failures in their drives. Since IBM got the 75GXP issue, it seems like every IBM drive to fail after that has given it an exponentially worse reputation. Personally, I've owned 2 IBM drives, 60GXP and the (35? GXP), and they've not failed for approximately 3 years.
Of all my friends who had 75GXP's fail was because they had very poor cooling. Even though their cases had adequate air flow, they put their drives stacked on top of each other. Do that to 4+ harddrives, leave them on 24/7, and even the best harddrives will fail.
