feelingshorter
Platinum Member
- May 5, 2004
- 2,439
- 0
- 71
Originally posted by: user1234
Originally posted by: Barnacle Bill
Originally posted by: user1234
the gap between X800XL and 6800GT pci-e just seems to grow. The cheapest 6800gt pci-e I've seen is like $370, so this is $115 cheaper. pretty hot for a card which is 20% faster in HL2 and a bunch of other games.
Hi user1234,
Could you please provide some links which point to the benchmarks showing the 20% faster performance of the X800XL over the 6800GT? Are there any hardware differences between the X800XL and the X800XT and if so exactly what are they and is it possible to mod the XL (software or hardware) to make it an XT?? Thanks!
here's the HL2 benchmarks (also includes many other games in other pages of this article):
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/2004-27gpu2_11.html
excerpt from results for HL2 d1_canal @1024x768, no AA/AF : X800XL=101.1 fps, 6800GT=75.1, same demo @1600x1200, 4xAA, 16xAF: 51.1 vs 31.9
Originally posted by: user1234
Originally posted by: xenolith
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
The X800XL is only faster in a few benchmarks like HL2. Overall, it's a tad slower and won't be able to play AoEIII in all it's glory because of the lack of SM3.0.
In fact, I posted this thread, and I didn't even buy it. I'm sticking with my 6600GT for now.
I read some place (sorry can't remember) that SM3.0 is such a resource hog that even the 6800 Ultra would have a hard time running decent frames with it fully enabled. Kind of like the way the older cards handled FSAA was when it was first implemented.
So, you'll probably need to get a next gen card to run AoEIII with all the bells and whistles anyway.
Agreed. In my opinion running Chronicles of Riddick with the SM2++ mode (soft shadows) turned on is unplayable on my 6800GT (overclocked to Ultra speed). It's just too damn slow. In fact I stopped playing and was disappointed by the game until I read the article below which explains that the game turns this feature is on by default when it detects the new nvidia cards, but once it's turned off I could finally enjoy this great game.
http://firingsquad.com/hardware/chronicles_of_riddick_performance/
by the way, I believe this game is based on the doom 3 engine, and as such it shows a large advantage for 6800GT over X800XL. But if you choose to turn on the "soft shadows" mode the frame rate drop to a whopping 1/3 of the regular mode, which makes the game unplayable on anything short of top of the line SLI rig.
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
Awesome deal, this solidifies getting the XL over a 6800GT in PCI-E if you were to build a computer today.
That is one result from one review and in only ONE demo... and the review goes on to explain they have driver trouble with their test rigs. Not exactly a good representation of overall performance, especially considering that specific game was coded just for ATI.
Originally posted by: Boztech
Originally posted by: user1234
Originally posted by: Barnacle Bill
Originally posted by: user1234
the gap between X800XL and 6800GT pci-e just seems to grow. The cheapest 6800gt pci-e I've seen is like $370, so this is $115 cheaper. pretty hot for a card which is 20% faster in HL2 and a bunch of other games.
Hi user1234,
Could you please provide some links which point to the benchmarks showing the 20% faster performance of the X800XL over the 6800GT? Are there any hardware differences between the X800XL and the X800XT and if so exactly what are they and is it possible to mod the XL (software or hardware) to make it an XT?? Thanks!
here's the HL2 benchmarks (also includes many other games in other pages of this article):
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/2004-27gpu2_11.html
excerpt from results for HL2 d1_canal @1024x768, no AA/AF : X800XL=101.1 fps, 6800GT=75.1, same demo @1600x1200, 4xAA, 16xAF: 51.1 vs 31.9
That is one result from one review and in only ONE demo... and the review goes on to explain they have driver trouble with their test rigs. Not exactly a good representation of overall performance, especially considering that specific game was coded just for ATI.
Look at other reviews to get a more comprehensive idea of how the card stacks up..
http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NzAwLDU=
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2299&p=4
..from what I consider are more reliable sources in the first place. The difference is not so dramatic. In all other games besides Far Cry, at stock speeds, the GT is much more playable.
That's not to say that for $254 it isn't the best card you can buy, I would however be weary of the Connect3d brand and the fact you are buying OEM (less warranty). Not all cards are created equal especially the mem. chips that are utilized.
I just don't want it to be misrepresented as "20% faster in HL2 and lots of other games." It is roughly 5-8% faster in a game that is coded for it (HL2), in almost all other games, it lags behind either slightly or by a reasonable margin... and in Doom 3, the difference is massive.
Originally posted by: JuicyLucy
Originally posted by: Boztech
That is one result from one review and in only ONE demo... and the review goes on to explain they have driver trouble with their test rigs. Not exactly a good representation of overall performance, especially considering that specific game was coded just for ATI.
That's why I would never pay more than $100 for this card, no matter what the fanboys say ATI drivers always have and always will suck.
Originally posted by: Commando8
All I can say about Connect 3D is that you get what you pay for. I have had some bad experiences with their cards in the past. On the flipside, I haven't had any problems with built by ATI cards or Sapphire (strangely enough)...
Originally posted by: cpush
NO its over! Did anyone quote the price who doesn't plan on buying it? If soo.. plz pm me![]()
