Anyone else disappointed with the performance of these systems? I bought 3 of 'em and have been shocked at the sluggish Windows performance. I've got 512MB and all the Windows dazzle stuff turned off and still the systems are seriously sluggish compared to my basic P350/W2K system, dramatically slower than my Athlon1000/XP system, and painfully slow compared to my P1.8/RDRAM/IDE-RAID0 system. I don't get it? How could this system be so slow? I expected it to perform nearly as well as my P1.8/RAID system at least for basic operations.
B.T.W. I already corrected a few deficiencies: The hard drives were all set to "quiet" mode,
Setting them to "fast" bumped the Sandra score a few thousand points. All Sandra scores are now on par with the hardware except for some reason the HDD score varies wildly from 12K-17K on repeated tests. The NIC's are running at 100-full duplex through my switch but performance is what I'd expect from a 10BT card on a shared hub, yes 10 base. My old 3COM fixed that.
B.B.T.W. 2 of my 3 systems included the Intellimouse Explorer! All three included 16X burn-proof drives!
Finally, for anyone else wanting to set their drive to fast, the above utility must be run from a
boot disk and the "off" option is much noisier and
slower than the fast option in my experience. The noise differences are only evident on seeks of course, not idle noise.