Originally posted by: eviltommy
had my boss ordered me one.. $699 shipped (tax exempt thru business)
fingers crossed over whitespot/deadpixels.
edit: i have no clue why they gave it to him for $699.. but i cant complain![]()
Originally posted by: Ph34rful
Mine is still in pre-production and I ordered monday night?
What's the deal with that?
Originally posted by: J9JM3
Uh oh. I got a oct 2003 monitor with no bad pixels but I played a dvd full screen and noticed the excess light in the top right. Not as bad as the pics posted by getsome but still noticeable.
this is while playing a DVD with the room lights off. During Normal windows desktop, I can not notice it at all. Crap everything else is fine. I guess I will play with for a few days and decide whether to return it. Just afraid to waste time and get another monitor with the same issue.
Originally posted by: bubbafish
Just received mine today (Wed).
October batch. A00.
No dead pixels. No white light at top right of screen.
I already have two 2000FPs, and in comparison, the 2001FP is much brighter than the 2000FPs. As for games, it rocks, but then again, I never really thought the 2000FP was streaky, even in first-person shooters.
I'd have to say the 2001FP is a winner.
Bubbafish
Originally posted by: audscott
What bugs me is the lag in Q3....Descent & U2 are fine, but the low refresh rate in Q3 makes the game look terrible....anyone know a work around?
Originally posted by: olliebg
Originally posted by: audscott
What bugs me is the lag in Q3....Descent & U2 are fine, but the low refresh rate in Q3 makes the game look terrible....anyone know a work around?
LCD's don't have a refresh rate due to the fact that the pixels are controlled by direct electrical current through dedicated transistors, and not by a scanning electronic beam that "refreshes" the screen at a certain frequency per second.
Originally posted by: audscott
Originally posted by: olliebg
Originally posted by: audscott
What bugs me is the lag in Q3....Descent & U2 are fine, but the low refresh rate in Q3 makes the game look terrible....anyone know a work around?
LCD's don't have a refresh rate due to the fact that the pixels are controlled by direct electrical current through dedicated transistors, and not by a scanning electronic beam that "refreshes" the screen at a certain frequency per second.
O.K.....Since that digital refresh response of the LCD is lower than the playable game rate, it looks like I need to find a new favorite. :|
Originally posted by: 'BARtMAN'
Originally posted by: audscott
Originally posted by: olliebg
Originally posted by: audscott
What bugs me is the lag in Q3....Descent & U2 are fine, but the low refresh rate in Q3 makes the game look terrible....anyone know a work around?
LCD's don't have a refresh rate due to the fact that the pixels are controlled by direct electrical current through dedicated transistors, and not by a scanning electronic beam that "refreshes" the screen at a certain frequency per second.
O.K.....Since that digital refresh response of the LCD is lower than the playable game rate, it looks like I need to find a new favorite. :|
There still are refresh rates with LCDs, if you would notice at 1600x1200 this LCD can only do it 60hz... Might as well put vsync on when your playing at 60hz (that's what I do). It helps cut down on tearing which can be annoying to me at times.. So even if you have a 1ms panel, you'd still be only getting 60hz from the videocard...
Originally posted by: alexneuman
Yeah, i also bought one of these a year ago and i paid about $807 because i had to pay sales tax. Great deal! Great product.
Originally posted by: pprior
WTF - how did you get it for $699 - you can't leave us hanging like that. We want DETAILS.
Originally posted by: halik
hahaha damn you tommy!