• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Question DDR5 MB first AMD or Intel?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Kedas

Senior member
AMD has the flexibility to do DDR4 and DDR5 at the same time with the same 8 core dies. (limited cost)
Intel has the money to just make extra dies. (after they figure out to use 10nm or not)
 
Did Haswell ever support DDR4?
Haswell-E did, though true that's a new chip entirely.
but for me, I would like them to keep the voltages high where possible (process) and start chasing some higher clocks!
I'm afraid that DDR5 will need active cooling regardless. BTW Hynix plans DDR5-8400 with just 1.1v so the clocks will be fine regardless (just think what 1.25v can do then). Also, there hasn't been a DDR generation that hasn't lowered voltages
 
Also, there hasn't been a DDR generation that hasn't lowered voltages

That's what I'm talking about. If you look at DDR latency by generation, some of the best latency rated in ns still belongs to some old DDR systems from over a decade ago. I don't expect AMD to go that low due to IF, but the opportunities for lower latency are there.
 
Haswell-E did, though true that's a new chip entirely.

Also Broadwell and Skylake. I have a 6700HQ laptop with DDR3. I'm not sure if the IMC in all Skylake derivatives still supports DDR 3 though. Certainly the platforms haven't been exposing support for a long time.
 
Back
Top