what I think is nice that we can at least settle the ongoing "debate" of which is faster, the GTS-U or the 6000?
Lots of nvidiots and 3dfx zealots are still arguing over this, when they have no concrete evidence pointing toward superiority either way.
my guess is that the GTS-U smokes the "6000" in resolutions @ 1024 and below, are probably about even @ 1024, and the "6000" takes a lead @ 1280 and 1600.
also, FSAA almost definitely would go to the "6000", I would assume
I'm told that the "6k" runs @ 183, BTw.