• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Dayum, Dallas starts with D, who woulda believed it?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
Originally posted by: iamme
Originally posted by: LeeTJ


Not many NBA teams have won with only 1 superstar. The only one in recent memory that I can remember is Houston Rockets.

they had Olajuwon and Drexler.

Drexler was with Houston then?? i thought he was with portland. was this after he left portland?? if so, he was way past his prime.

check out his stats. he wasn't in his prime, but he was good for 20pts 7reb 4-5asts per game.

1994-1995 stats
1995-1996 stats

san antonio's last championship is a better example of a team w/ 1 superstar, IMO. i think D. Robinson was more past his prime than Drexler was.
 
Originally posted by: iamme
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
Originally posted by: iamme
Originally posted by: LeeTJ


Not many NBA teams have won with only 1 superstar. The only one in recent memory that I can remember is Houston Rockets.

they had Olajuwon and Drexler.

Drexler was with Houston then?? i thought he was with portland. was this after he left portland?? if so, he was way past his prime.

check out his stats. he wasn't in his prime, but he was good for 20pts 7reb 4-5asts per game.

1994-1995 stats
1995-1996 stats

san antonio's last championship is a better example of a team w/ 1 superstar, IMO. i think D. Robinson was more past his prime than Drexler was.

mb

Your right. I guess, having lived in Portland during the years that Drexler and company lost to MJ, i always think of Drexler as a Blazer and i forgot he was on that Houston team. 🙂

anyway, still goes to support the contention that most teams that have won it all have done so with 2 stars.

i don't think Either NJ or Spurs have 2 stars right now, tho KMart might be getting close to star status. and Ginobli looks pretty good to me as does Rose.
 
i'm surprised he found it so strange that a FAN would overreact. What does he expect from a FAN??

i've been a sports nut for most of my life. i take sports seriously. and i hate it when people make ludicrous claims like "NJ has NO chance".
rolleye.gif
 
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
i'm surprised he found it so strange that a FAN would overreact. What does he expect from a FAN??

i've been a sports nut for most of my life. i take sports seriously. and i hate it when people make ludicrous claims like "NJ has NO chance".
rolleye.gif

my home team being in the east, i've taken offense when people are so quick to dismiss the east. i really hope that NJ beats (what looks to be) the Spurs.

last year, i actually put it in my sig that NJ would win in 7. maybe i jinxed them 🙁
 
Originally posted by: iamme
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
i'm surprised he found it so strange that a FAN would overreact. What does he expect from a FAN??

i've been a sports nut for most of my life. i take sports seriously. and i hate it when people make ludicrous claims like "NJ has NO chance".
rolleye.gif

my home team being in the east, i've taken offense when people are so quick to dismiss the east. i really hope that NJ beats (what looks to be) the Spurs.

last year, i actually put it in my sig that NJ would win in 7. maybe i jinxed them 🙁

Oh ya, i remember you i think. you're the Pistons fan.
 
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
Originally posted by: iamme
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
i'm surprised he found it so strange that a FAN would overreact. What does he expect from a FAN??

i've been a sports nut for most of my life. i take sports seriously. and i hate it when people make ludicrous claims like "NJ has NO chance".
rolleye.gif

my home team being in the east, i've taken offense when people are so quick to dismiss the east. i really hope that NJ beats (what looks to be) the Spurs.

last year, i actually put it in my sig that NJ would win in 7. maybe i jinxed them 🙁

Oh ya, i remember you i think. you're the Pistons fan.

you're that rabid Nets fan w/ the gambling problem, right?

😛
 
Originally posted by: iamme
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
Originally posted by: iamme
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
i'm surprised he found it so strange that a FAN would overreact. What does he expect from a FAN??

i've been a sports nut for most of my life. i take sports seriously. and i hate it when people make ludicrous claims like "NJ has NO chance".
rolleye.gif

my home team being in the east, i've taken offense when people are so quick to dismiss the east. i really hope that NJ beats (what looks to be) the Spurs.

last year, i actually put it in my sig that NJ would win in 7. maybe i jinxed them 🙁

Oh ya, i remember you i think. you're the Pistons fan.

you're that rabid Nets fan w/ the gambling problem, right?

😛

HAHAHAHA

actually i haven't gambled since i gave it up during my college years. Got into a lot of trouble gambling, but i also knew that offering a bet of 30:1 odds was a sure deal here. I knew he wouldn't come thru. 🙂

it's not a bet if it's a sure thing.
 
Nets have no chance in the finals. Assuming SA wins the west (which it seems they will now), they will beat the Nets in 5 games. The Nets aren't in the Mavs or Lakers class, much less the Spurs. To think otherwise is ignorant LeeTJ 🙂

I will offer a bet. I cannot go $300 because I have a baby on the way. However I am willing to put up $25 for bragging rights. If you are man enough that is 😉 Whoever loses paypals the winner of the bet, which is that SA will beat the Nets in the finals (# of games irrelevant)
 
Originally posted by: wyvrn
Nets have no chance in the finals. Assuming SA wins the west (which it seems they will now), they will beat the Nets in 5 games. The Nets aren't in the Mavs or Lakers class, much less the Spurs. To think otherwise is ignorant LeeTJ 🙂

I will offer a bet. I cannot go $300 because I have a baby on the way. However I am willing to put up $25 for bragging rights. If you are man enough that is 😉 Whoever loses paypals the winner of the bet, which is that SA will beat the Nets in the finals (# of games irrelevant)

HAHAHAHA

apparently you can't read. And you have less than even the smallest bit of confidence in your own predictions. Odds i offered was 30:1. I've never claimed the Nets had better than even odds. You however HAVE claimed so and do even now. So if your going to put up $25, than i'll put up my $1.00. I offered 30:1 odds, i can live with 25:1 odds.

Take it or leave it.
 
Originally posted by: LeeTJ

HAHAHAHA

apparently you can't read. And you have less than even the smallest bit of confidence in your own predictions. Odds i offered was 30:1. I've never claimed the Nets had better than even odds. You however HAVE claimed so and do even now. So if your going to put up $25, than i'll put up my $1.00. I offered 30:1 odds, i can live with 25:1 odds.

Take it or leave it.

wow, what a huge nets fan you are, willing to take "only" 25:1 odds. If you are confident in the nets, why not take them 1:1?
 
Originally posted by: wyvrn
wow, what a huge nets fan you are, willing to take "only" 25:1 odds. If you are confident in the nets, why not take them 1:1?

Exactly. Besides, it's only $25 when he loses 😉

i never made the claim that the Nets were a SURE thing. Wyvrn Did.


This is about your comments that whichever team wins (mavs or Spurs) are a sure thing to win against NJ.

IF they are a sure thing, why should i give you 1:1 odds?

I know that the Nets go in as Underdogs, I've never quibbled with that. BUT underdogs HAVE been known to win.

Once again, I never ever made the comment ANYWHERE that the NETS are a SURE thing, You on the other hand have.

apparently your word is worth about as much as you are. NOTHING.
 
Originally posted by: wyvrn
I gave you even odds, 1:1. Now the ball is in your court, mouse man.

Are you man enough to take it? If not, then STFU 🙂

HAHAHA

IF you rescind the comment that NJ has NO chance to win. 🙂

you started this whole thing by making a LUDICROUS comment. so i gave you fair odds.

IF the best you can do is 1:1 then by your own admission NJ has an EVEN chance of winning OR you are just a thief.

take your pick.
 
That mean you aren't taking the bet, mouse-man?


Originally posted by: LeeTJ
Originally posted by: wyvrn
I gave you even odds, 1:1. Now the ball is in your court, mouse man.

Are you man enough to take it? If not, then STFU 🙂

HAHAHA

IF you rescind the comment that NJ has NO chance to win. 🙂

you started this whole thing by making a LUDICROUS comment. so i gave you fair odds.

IF the best you can do is 1:1 then by your own admission NJ has an EVEN chance of winning OR you are just a thief.

take your pick.

 
actually wyvrn. you seem to be severely deluded. I made the offer of a bet. You chickened out.

As to your counter offer, that is ludicrous because it settles NOTHING.

Unless you are willing to concede that NJ does have a chance and not ZERO chance as you've claimed.

So here it stands, I made you an offer, you turned it down, then you must have gotten your wifes permission to bet your measly $25 and you are offering me a bet straight up and i've said to you I'll take it at $25 to $1, take it or leave it. Mouseman.
 
You keep going on and on about me not being a man, what exactly am i NOT owning up too??

and what are YOU not owning up to??

you have NO idea what this discussion is about anymore do you, you just want to hurl insults because your little pride has been hurt.
rolleye.gif


anyone that takes the internet that seriously needs help.
 
Back
Top