MrSquished
Lifer
- Jan 14, 2013
- 26,067
- 24,397
- 136
I think a bunch of old fogeys are anti keeping the time as it should be, which is how it is right now.
So, we should continue to have this bad policy since schools knowingly open too soon? Do you also know that kids have been shown to learn less because schools open too soon as well? Learning is directly related to the amount of time the sun has been up, not the clock setting. Any school opening before roughly 10 AM is just harming kids sleep, health, learning, and grades. Not to mention that by starting later, schools can put a significant dent in the number of delinquent kids without parental supervision after school.
Never thought about the drive in theater business. Did any of you?For those who wanted confirmation that DST was once made permanent, it was done on an emergency basis by President Nixon:
Oh, I must confess I am an old fogey.
Pardon me for missing your subtle satire given your propensity for frothing at the mouth, mea culpa.PLEASE!!!! It's called SATIRE. Hitler, DST,
However, you get the idea as to how completely OCD ignorant DST is and has been ever since its inception.
And.... it must go.![]()
I know there's one near here, and there was one near where I lived in Nebraska, too.Never thought about the drive in theater business. Did any of you?
As it is out here, you can't light off fireworks before 9:45.
The country tried this in 1974 and it was horrible. School children were walking to school or waiting for buses in the dark.
Despite wide support to make DST permanent, the danger to children and eventual disenchantment with the idea led most to rail against it.
People back then were a lot dumber than we are now.I guess they can try it again, right?
Permanent daylight saving time? America tried it before ... and it didn't go well
I think it's fair to say a lot has changed since then.I guess they can try it again, right?
Permanent daylight saving time? America tried it before ... and it didn't go well
Well, this could give them a great opportunity to do a longer-term study, at a year of being on DST, and maybe even two years and beyondWould permanent daylight saving time actually improve our sleep? Here's what experts say | Salon.com
"Although chronic effects of remaining in daylight saving time year-round have not been well studied, daylight saving time is less aligned with human circadian biology — which, due to the impacts of the delayed natural light/dark cycle on human activity, could result in circadian misalignment, which has been associated in some studies with increased cardiovascular disease risk, metabolic syndrome and other health risks," the coalition of scientists stated in 2020. "It is, therefore, the position of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine that these seasonal time changes should be abolished in favor of a fixed, national, year-round standard time."
One study published in 2006 analyzed the timing of sleep and activity for eight weeks in 50 people after the daylight saving time transition. The authors of the study bluntly concluded that "the human circadian system does not adjust to DST."
In a separate study that surveyed 55,000, researchers found that on their days off, despite the DST time change, people followed the seasonal progression of dawn, and not the time on their clocks.
Just saying.
Also, the greatest danger from walking, day or night, stems from us building communities that favor the automobile over any other method of transportation.Easy solution: Have school start an hour later. problem solved. It amazes me the stupidity of people, where their solution to the children walking in the dark, is one that effects 320 Million people, rather than one that only effects the schools and the children attending.
Would permanent daylight saving time actually improve our sleep? Here's what experts say | Salon.com
"Although chronic effects of remaining in daylight saving time year-round have not been well studied, daylight saving time is less aligned with human circadian biology — which, due to the impacts of the delayed natural light/dark cycle on human activity, could result in circadian misalignment, which has been associated in some studies with increased cardiovascular disease risk, metabolic syndrome and other health risks," the coalition of scientists stated in 2020. "It is, therefore, the position of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine that these seasonal time changes should be abolished in favor of a fixed, national, year-round standard time."
One study published in 2006 analyzed the timing of sleep and activity for eight weeks in 50 people after the daylight saving time transition. The authors of the study bluntly concluded that "the human circadian system does not adjust to DST."
In a separate study that surveyed 55,000, researchers found that on their days off, despite the DST time change, people followed the seasonal progression of dawn, and not the time on their clocks.
Just saying.
Before the Industrial Revelation, the only people who cared about time were monks and sea captains.ffs they know time, as in the clock is a human construct and actually makes no GD difference, because we can choose to get up and go to sleep despite the numbers on some device?
or we can stick with " the numbers on this device control our health" that seems better somehow to people?
Well, and couriers.Before the Industrial Revelation, the only people who cared about time were monks and sea captains.
Well, and couriers.
And the Azteks.
Battlefield commanders probably did.
Fishermen...
Anyone in the bush anywhere, at least a close approximation of time.
Probably others.
I guess that's kind of a philosophical question, nowadays though it matters to everyone, because it matters to everyone.what he and I mean, is that the actual numbers are not as important as we think, its the passing of time and our experience of it that is important. but making the number it says at sun up a 6 or a 7 really is of little consequence. does it matter that everyone show up at a predetemed time matter? it could. does it matter if it says 8 on a clock? no.
