Cerpin Taxt
Lifer
- Feb 23, 2005
- 11,940
- 542
- 126
False.Sure they do, you just refuse to admit it.
So your claim is now that there AREN'T words that say what you claim they say.You are limiting human writing quite a bit. There is almost as much said in what is missing as what is there. When you choose specific words, you are saying much more than what those words say.
Thanks for conceding the point.
That is the most totured abuse of logic I've ever seen. No wonder you're such an idiot.I return you to jill falling down the hill after Jack. Did she bust her head open like Jack did? There are no words saying she did not, but since there are words saying Jack did and nothing saying Jill did as well, we can rightfully say Jill did not break her head. Nowhere does it say such, but we know it is true nonetheless due to the absense of including Jill in the head breaking.
Homer's Iliad doesn't say that Abraham Lincoln was President, therefore Abraham Lincoln wasn't President.
Fuck's sake, that's a new level of stupid. Congrats.
It doesn't matter, it wouldn't help your argument.To a limited extent I can, limited only by vocabulary. I have troubles when the nikkud are missing, and usually try to find versions with them. My siddur uses nikkud, and it is a huge help. The above is missing the nikkud, would it help you if I posted a version with them added?
I didn't say that I couldn't read them.Why did you rant and rave for the actual words if you could not read them? Seems pretty foolish to foam at the mouth for something you cannot understand.