Data-life on SATA Hard Drives

bflat

Junior Member
May 31, 2005
3
0
0
I work in a biomedical research lab which currently collects about 0.5 terra-bytes of data per year (with backup 1 terra-byte). I plan to go to an all hard-drive storage-system and would like to know the expected life span of data on typical (SATA) hard-drives.

bflat
 

Scrubber

Member
May 23, 2005
61
0
0
Originally posted by: bflat
I work in a biomedical research lab which currently collects about 0.5 terra-bytes of data per year (with backup 1 terra-byte). I plan to go to an all hard-drive storage-system and would like to know the expected life span of data on typical (SATA) hard-drives.

bflat

All the big names i.e. Seagate, Western Digital, Maxtor etc., offer a five year warranty. So at least that.
 

RichUK

Lifer
Feb 14, 2005
10,341
678
126
Hard drive life span is measured in *hours* *running*. It's called MTBF - Mean time before failure. Typical numbers in the last few years are 500,000 to 1,000,000 hours ... at the end of the day HDD's are mechanical and will fail, most die due to mishandling.

  1. Shock

    abruptly cutting power

    Some have electrical failures (Electronics.)

The only thing that you will have to keep in mind is just keep regualy backups of the data retreived, whether it be daily or weekly..
 

FlyingPenguin

Golden Member
Nov 1, 2000
1,793
0
0
Well maybe not forever but a long time. Magnetic fields do fade away over time, but it would probably take a LONG time. How long I'm not sure. I've personally reovered data off 5 year old drives sitting in storage, no problem.

Environmental conditions can have an adverse effect though. This is an electronic device. It's sensitive to static electricity, moisture, even a nearby lightning strike can damage it due to magnetic induction (yes, with the drive physically disconnected, lightning can still damage it, I've seen it).

If this is VERY mission critical data I'd do something more than just store the drive. I'd store the drive AND make DVD backups (you can get 18Gb compressed on dual layer DVDs).

Even DVDs have a limited shelf life unless you spend the money on premium ones that are certified for 50+ years. You don't buy these at Office Depot.

I'd feel more comfortable with a HDD and a DVD backup - one covers the other.
 

Mark R

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,513
16
81
What about hard-drive-data shelf-life?

There's little data about 'shelf-life' in modern hard drives. Most reliability figures assume that the drive is in operation for at least part of the time. Simply storing a drive can cause its own type of breakdown - a very characteristic failure mode called 'stiction' was common on older drives which had been stored for several months (essentially, the lubricating oils could solidify once left undisturbed, eventually jamming the drive).

Depending on how important your data is I would be very careful in assuming that your drives will last longer than 5- 7 years.

If you need to store your data for a long time 5 years and up, you need to consider the ability to retrieve it from storage if required. E.g. my local hospital kept copies of CT and MRI scans on mageneto-optical disc since they first installed their scanners about 15 years ago. The original discs were 128 MB. Since then compatible, but higher performance, discs have been introduced, 500 MB, and lately 2 GB. However, a problem that has come to light in recent years is that even though all the discs and drives are from the same manufacturer and nominally compatible, the modern drives do not reliably read first generation discs. The hospital only has one working 1st generation drive left, which is sometimes the only way to read old discs.

While IDE and SATA are likely to be around for a long time to come, if you are planning on keeping drives for more than 10 years, you'd need to develop some sort of contingency plan in case SATA-IV (or whatever the technology of the day) controllers have some sort of compatability problem with older drives.

You may need to develop a policy of data 'refreshing' - where every 3-5 years you buy new state-of-the-art storage equipment and copy your entire archive onto the latest technology, ensuring that your data isn't stuck on obsolete and unusable technology.

I have to confess I do favour the use of optical storage with a very well supported format like DVD. I've never had a problem reading any medical CD on any computer even with 8 year old discs. The advantage of a ubiquitous format like DVD is that it's likely to be supported for a very long time into the future. Additionally, optical media has a very different set of failure modes to hard drives - so 2 archives, one optical, one HD could be complementary. If you do decide to implement an optical archive, make sure that you use 'archive grade' (or 'medical' grade) blanks. These are more expensive, but if your data storage needs are only about 0.5 TB a year, then this is unlikely to be much of an issue.