So, I just bought a DVD burner with a big intention to use it to back-up my data (some random files and ~1.5 gb of pictures). I've seen on TechTV that they've said that an external hd is a good option to back-up your data and that we don't know the lifespan of burned media. Some manufacturers claim many years, but they have seen as little as 18 months. Now, I've had some problems with burned media that wasn't stored properly (no cases, all stacked together), but I have a cd that still works after at least 5 years on generic CD-R media.
Anyway, I thought about getting an external drive and a USB 2.0 card, but then I tried this 40 gb hd that I had lying around that I thought was dead. Turns out, it works fine. So, I've been copying the data over to that hard drive (as well as keeping copies on the original. Is there any reason why this isn't a good back-up option? Is there any reason to think that an external drive would fail less often than an internal one? I figure that it would be rare that both drives would die at the same time, so I'd always have a working copy of the files. I've also continued to use DVD RW's to also back-up (I even keep copies at work so that I have them in a location away from my computer).
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Thanks
Matt
Anyway, I thought about getting an external drive and a USB 2.0 card, but then I tried this 40 gb hd that I had lying around that I thought was dead. Turns out, it works fine. So, I've been copying the data over to that hard drive (as well as keeping copies on the original. Is there any reason why this isn't a good back-up option? Is there any reason to think that an external drive would fail less often than an internal one? I figure that it would be rare that both drives would die at the same time, so I'd always have a working copy of the files. I've also continued to use DVD RW's to also back-up (I even keep copies at work so that I have them in a location away from my computer).
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Thanks
Matt