• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

da Bears, 2006 NFC Champs - going to SUPERBOWL XLI, congrats!

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Looks like the Bears got away with a no call. How did the refs not call that penalty for trying to call a consecutive timeout?
 
No actual penalty, they just can't call the TO and the clock continues to run. According to Chris Meyers who talked to an official.
 
Originally posted by: KLin
Looks like the Bears got away with a no call. How did the refs not call that penalty for trying to call a consecutive timeout?

Because there's no penalty for it?
 
Originally posted by: FreshPrince
Originally posted by: KLin
Looks like the Bears got away with a no call. How did the refs not call that penalty for trying to call a consecutive timeout?

rex needs to start using his head

yeah no ******. he has been very very bad. at least no int so far.
 
Originally posted by: Heifetz
grossman is horrible. If Bears are going to win, it will be the D who wins it for them.

It always amazes me how people keep saying this about Grossman. If he throws for 300 yards and a td again like last week and has a better performance than both brady and manning, they'll keep saying it. Grossman is not horrible. He is inconsistent, yes, but he's far from horrible.
 
Looked down to me. Can it still be ruled a fumble because the ball was "starting to move" before he was completely down?

Edit: apparently it can. DAMMIT! :|
 
Back
Top