• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

D800/5diii

If you watch both videos the D800 has better Raw files but just slightly but when it comes to jpeg the MarkIII was better. The higher FPS really is a choke point on the D800 and will probably make the Canon users feel better about having to spend the extra $500. In low light (jpeg) the MarkIII was a stop or so better.
 
Canons jpg engine in the mkIII is great, but probably a touch too much high ISO NR.

Raw files from the D800 will be better, usually. But only if you are shooting lower ISO and with good lenses and between f4 and f8.

Otherwise the 5d3 is as good or better.

D800 is poor for video vs 5d3 if thats of interest.
 
Canon's JPEG engine has always been better than Nikons. High MP bodies will always require much higher shot discipline eg. better hand-holding techniques, higher shutter speed, and most important a solid tripod.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top