D-SLR fanatics...Adobe Lightroom Beta released

fuzzybabybunny

Moderator<br>Digital & Video Cameras
Moderator
Jan 2, 2006
10,455
35
91
OMG! Looking at the videos right now and Lightroom is going to be GOD.
 
Oct 19, 2000
17,860
4
81
Thanks NFS, I'll check it out. I'm glad this came out when it did, I'll now try it out before making a decision to purchase Capture NX (I may stick with Capture 4.4).
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
48
91
It friggin' AMAZING how fast it zips through RAW files. It takes Photoshop and Microsoft RAW Viewer forever to cycle through them on my PC.
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: NFS4
It friggin' AMAZING how fast it zips through RAW files. It takes Photoshop and Microsoft RAW Viewer forever to cycle through them on my PC.

which is all sortof weird

when browsing raw photos on my 350d its way faster, just instant, with jpg it takes a while
 

PricklyPete

Lifer
Sep 17, 2002
14,582
162
106
I've been waiting to use this product. I definitely need something to help manage my photos.
 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
Still looking, but hey, sounds like Stewart Copeland in the Play on the opening page. Must be good. ;)
 

aphex

Moderator<br>All Things Apple
Moderator
Jul 19, 2001
38,572
2
91
actually, the lightroom beta has been out for awhile on OSX... gonna try the Win version tonight when i get home...

I like the layout of it, but it was incredibly slow on a 1.42ghz G4 where CS2 runs just fine.
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
48
91
Originally posted by: aphex
actually, the lightroom beta has been out for awhile on OSX... gonna try the Win version tonight when i get home...

I like the layout of it, but it was incredibly slow on a 1.42ghz G4 where CS2 runs just fine.

Yeah, it lags a bit. It takes like 10 seconds for it to even attempt to open CS2 after I click the export button.
 

PricklyPete

Lifer
Sep 17, 2002
14,582
162
106
Originally posted by: chuckywang
How is this different/better than Aperture?

Lets see...

1) Works on the PC
2) Has a more flexible file management system
3) Doesn't introduce artifacts in final output
4) Is made with bits of real pather...so you know it's good!
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
52,215
7,550
136
Originally posted by: PricklyPete
Originally posted by: chuckywang
How is this different/better than Aperture?

Lets see...

1) Works on the PC
2) Has a more flexible file management system
3) Doesn't introduce artifacts in final output
4) Is made with bits of real pather...so you know it's good!

I still like Picasa :D OT, I've been trying to get myself on iPhoto, but I just can't. I like Picasa so much better. Lightroom looks like it has the simplicity of Picasa coupled with the power of Adobe's technology.
 

SLCentral

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2003
3,542
0
71
Anyone else finding it to be really SLOW? I'm not sure if it offloads work on the GPU (as my GPU sucks), but otherwise, my computers specs are pretty nice and this thing is chugging along.
 

PricklyPete

Lifer
Sep 17, 2002
14,582
162
106
Originally posted by: SLCentral
Anyone else finding it to be really SLOW? I'm not sure if it offloads work on the GPU (as my GPU sucks), but otherwise, my computers specs are pretty nice and this thing is chugging along.

They have stated in their release notes that they have yet to hit their performance goals in windows...and that they are still working towards that. I'm fairly certain they will figure that out in no time...after all, this is the first release that supports Windows.

I am curious if it does attempt to offload any processing to the GPU. I know that was one of the "big things" about Aperture...but many people complained it had major performance issues as well. I'm curious to try this out on my home machine (which I'm currently fixing because of bad motherboard) and my laptop to see if there is a noticeable difference in speed.
 

soydios

Platinum Member
Mar 12, 2006
2,708
0
0
so...any idea what the price might be for the final release?
it looks cool, and I'm just starting to look around for if/when I get a DSLR (Nikon D50, methinks)
 

SLCentral

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2003
3,542
0
71
Originally posted by: PricklyPete
Originally posted by: SLCentral
Anyone else finding it to be really SLOW? I'm not sure if it offloads work on the GPU (as my GPU sucks), but otherwise, my computers specs are pretty nice and this thing is chugging along.

They have stated in their release notes that they have yet to hit their performance goals in windows...and that they are still working towards that. I'm fairly certain they will figure that out in no time...after all, this is the first release that supports Windows.

I am curious if it does attempt to offload any processing to the GPU. I know that was one of the "big things" about Aperture...but many people complained it had major performance issues as well. I'm curious to try this out on my home machine (which I'm currently fixing because of bad motherboard) and my laptop to see if there is a noticeable difference in speed.

Okay, didn't see that, thanks :thumbsup: