- Mar 9, 2005
- 16,197
- 4,881
- 136
RAM caught with their diesel hands in the cookie jar. I suppose that the VW diesel gate wasn't enough for them so they too rolled the dice and lost.
Net income in 2022 was $2.2B. So yeah, this is not super meaningful what it happened over the course of a decade...^^This. It's a numbers game.
This is why people need to go to jail.If it doesn't exceed the profits they made, then it's not really consequential.
Still, that is a large chunk of change.
Maybe the blatancy of the crime?Why did VW get 10B fine but Cummins only get 1.6B?
True but RAM might be ultimately responsible for what they sell to the public .Fix the title to match the article. It's not Ram, it is Cummins.
I'm guessing it's x amount per violation and each car is a violation.Why did VW get 10B fine but Cummins only get 1.6B?
From what I can see the sales were similar . ~half million .I'm guessing it's x amount per violation and each car is a violation.
No. Ram did not settle with the AG, Cummins did. If we can do just one thing, be accurate.True but RAM might be ultimately responsible for what they sell to the public .
They did similar things. I don't see why the punishment is so different. VW's solution was just more elegant.Maybe the blatancy of the crime?
VW turned off emission controls unless it was hooked up for testing.
As much as I hate c.a.r.b I have visually seen the difference that they have made in California .
As a general contractor I am ultimately responsible for what my subcontractors do. That's the reason why I stated this and I am being accurate as far as I know in California.No. Ram did not settle with the AG, Cummins did. If we can do just one thing, be accurate.
Well it better not be because of country of origin . That would make no sense.They did similar things. I don't see why the pinishment is so different.
Anyone who sells only gasoline engines? All the emissions cheats have been for diesels (or at least that I can recall)Is there a brand that has NOT cheated on the emission test at this point?
the case was settled between Cummins and the AG.As a general contractor I am ultimately responsible for what my subcontractors do. That's the reason why I stated this and I am being accurate as far as I know in California.
I changed it for accuracy, however, the original articles showed RAM and as the OEM for the trucks they are still on the hook for customer repairs.Fix the title to match the article. It's not Ram, it is Cummins.