<< why not pay more for Cumine 600or650e >>
Not reason not to, really just a question of how well the CPU you get will overclock. Assuming two things, you don't want to buy a new MB and you don't have a 1/4 PCI divider (BH6 Rev 1), then a Coppermine is in all likelihood limited to a 112 or 124 (maybe) FSB (124 puts your PCI at 41.3 Mhz, danger zone for my HD and NIC's).
Realistically, a 700e will get me 784 Mhz at the 112 FSB and will go for $200. The CuMine 633 will cost half that and may get me 950 Mhz with AGP/PCI in spec.
I realize a PIII at 784 may do somethings about as well as a CuMine at 950, but it won't do RC5 as well. I'm really only "renting" this option for 3-6 months until the 760/DDR stuff is available, stable and affordable, so why invest in a PIII?
I've got 2 machines to upgrade, 300/450 and a 366/550, so for $200 I can get a couple of CuMine 633's and perhaps get lucky. Going Duron means almost $300 in MB's. Worse case scenario is I get stuck using 75 Mhz FSB for 712 Mhz, close to what I will get out of a PIII. If one of the do will dance at 950 Mhz, I prolly won't even bother upgrading that one to a 760 sys.