• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Cuddlin' with Putin

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Sure it did, it had to do with the political discussion of police violence in America. The RT article you criticized told a story (of Clinton's emails being insecure for a few months apparently) that can also be referenced elsewhere.

Are you fucking stupid? Can you comprehend what people write because it sure as shit doesn't seem like it. Again, the point of the link I supplied was to reference an incident that happened, not the commentary. If you want to re litigate a link someone else provided then I suggest you reread that whole thread and comment in that thread.
 
Are you fucking stupid? Can you comprehend what people write because it sure as shit doesn't seem like it. Again, the point of the link I supplied was to reference an incident that happened, not the commentary. If you want to re litigate a link someone else provided then I suggest you reread that whole thread and comment in that thread.

And the link you had issue with was also a reference to an incident that happened. Nice double-standard as usual from you.
 
And the link you had issue with was also a reference to an incident that happened. Nice double-standard as usual from you.

Lol! Now you are just making shit up. No surprise, there doesn't appear to be an honest bone in you.

I made no comment about the link to RT, I simply stated that I've called out RT as being a propaganda network after you said only one person here has made that claim before.

But thanks for, yet again, illustrating your lack of reading comprehension (immediately after I pointed it out to no less), lol!
 
Back
Top