I'd love to see the gaming rig that runs GT5 at full settings (really).
Now why is he saying this? Because this is a team that made a boring generic shooter with massive hardware requirements for the PC that nobody bought. So now they are trying to blame their own failure to make an interesting game on somebody else. Granted, the new engine is supposed to be flexible for this but I'm betting they have had a few discussions that went "wouldn't this be so easy if people just had decent fucking hardware?"
That's just not true. PC hardware is holding PC gaming back. A 480 gtx isnt enough to play many PC games @ 1080P 60fps. If graphics leaped ahead we would all be playing slide shows or turning the settings down to low/med.
What game will a 480 gtx not play @ 1080p?
Metro DX11 Full Tessellation even without AA it'd have a very difficult time doing 50fps let alone 60.
Im sure to some people it'd be at least playable. Not everyone needs 60fps to play comfortably. I know people who are unbothered even in the 20's.
Um, he is doing something about it. CryEngine3 is the only engine that can render games on 3 different systems at the same time.
I don't get why there was so much hate for Crysis. I thought the gameplay was great in SP and the graphics were great even on all high. The game did pretty well critically if I'm not mistaken.
Metro DX11 Full Tessellation even without AA it'd have a very difficult time doing 50fps let alone 60.
Not all games needs +60FPS...motion blur killed that "concept".
Guess what Crysis uses a lot of?
Are you crazy? Motion blur actually makes the game feel slower. Motion blur is the 1st thing people turn of in crysis, metro I would turn it off if there was an individual option for it.
Gonna have to disagree here. Motion blur compensates for a slower frame rate
Take movies for example, they run at under 30fps yet they look smooth thanks to great motion blur.
False, google ID + tech5
Facts are sadly scare and far apart in this thread... :thumbsdown:
