• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Crysis 1.2 performance

X

x2 3600 rules sazakky

Senior member
MY system specs are:
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ AM2 90nm running at 2.7GHz
Sapphire X1900xtx 512mb
A-DAta 2 gb 533MHz DDR-2 ram at 1066MHz
Asus M2N-E Nforce 570 Ultra

It runs at around 15-25 FPS at 1024*768 at low to medium settings. Will the 1.2 patch make much difference.
 
no not really. Crysis will eat up any modern video cards. GT200 is Crysis only hope.
 
Originally posted by: Azn
no not really. Crysis will eat up any modern video cards. GT200 is Crysis only hope.
Click to expand...

Yes, I get around 40 FPS average with overclocked 512MB Crossfired HD 3870s paired up with a Q6600 OCed to 3.0Ghz on high settings at 1680x1050.
 
Will the 1.2 patch make much difference.
Click to expand...
The 1.2 patch does increase performance a bit. For my 8800 Ultra the combination of it and new drivers has allowed me to go from 2xAA to 4xAA.

With your card YMMV but you should definitely install the patch anyway if for no other reason than bug fixes.
 
Originally posted by: x2 3600 rules sazakky
MY system specs are:
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ AM2 90nm running at 2.7GHz
Sapphire X1900xtx 512mb
A-DAta 2 gb 533MHz DDR-2 ram at 1066MHz
Asus M2N-E Nforce 570 Ultra

It runs at around 15-25 FPS at 1024*768 at low to medium settings. Will the 1.2 patch make much difference.
Click to expand...

Your performance in crysis is a bit low for that card, when I had the GeCube X1950XT, I was able to play it at 1024x768 with everything on medium and was very playable, I even installed a mod that allowed to activate Very High Quality to some settings, everything was on high, except water, shader, and game effects that were on very high, and shadows on medium and it ran average at 27fps, barely playable though. You should check your videocard drivers, RAM timings or chipset driver.
 
Originally posted by: evolucion8
Originally posted by: x2 3600 rules sazakky
MY system specs are:
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ AM2 90nm running at 2.7GHz
Sapphire X1900xtx 512mb
A-DAta 2 gb 533MHz DDR-2 ram at 1066MHz
Asus M2N-E Nforce 570 Ultra

It runs at around 15-25 FPS at 1024*768 at low to medium settings. Will the 1.2 patch make much difference.
Click to expand...

Your performance in crysis is a bit low for that card, when I had the GeCube X1950XT, I was able to play it at 1024x768 with everything on medium and was very playable, I even installed a mod that allowed to activate Very High Quality to some settings, everything was on high, except water, shader, and game effects that were on very high, and shadows on medium and it ran average at 27fps, barely playable though. You should check your videocard drivers, RAM timings or chipset driver.
Click to expand...

i think the single core cpu may be the culprit here.

EDIT: 1.2 did make a noticable performance difference when i was playing crysis, was able to bump the resolution one notch to 1440x900 while keeping about the same perf as with the 1.1 patch.
 
Originally posted by: TC91
Originally posted by: evolucion8
Originally posted by: x2 3600 rules sazakky
MY system specs are:
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ AM2 90nm running at 2.7GHz
Sapphire X1900xtx 512mb
A-DAta 2 gb 533MHz DDR-2 ram at 1066MHz
Asus M2N-E Nforce 570 Ultra

It runs at around 15-25 FPS at 1024*768 at low to medium settings. Will the 1.2 patch make much difference.
Click to expand...

Your performance in crysis is a bit low for that card, when I had the GeCube X1950XT, I was able to play it at 1024x768 with everything on medium and was very playable, I even installed a mod that allowed to activate Very High Quality to some settings, everything was on high, except water, shader, and game effects that were on very high, and shadows on medium and it ran average at 27fps, barely playable though. You should check your videocard drivers, RAM timings or chipset driver.
Click to expand...

i think the single core cpu may be the culprit here.

EDIT: 1.2 did make a noticable performance difference when i was playing crysis, was able to bump the resolution one notch to 1440x900 while keeping about the same perf as with the 1.1 patch.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but I can play it at higher quality settings and get better performance and I have a single core CPU, we're not talking about Pentium 4 gaming performance, the Athlon 64 is a nice chip for gaming.
 
Crytek's engines aren't made to run games. They're made to make people go Oooooo, and/or brag about getting almost playable fps on their $2000 computer. Hell, farcry looks like ass and STILL runs slower than any game I own on Valves HL2 engine.
 
Originally posted by: evolucion8
Originally posted by: TC91
Originally posted by: evolucion8
Originally posted by: x2 3600 rules sazakky
MY system specs are:
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ AM2 90nm running at 2.7GHz
Sapphire X1900xtx 512mb
A-DAta 2 gb 533MHz DDR-2 ram at 1066MHz
Asus M2N-E Nforce 570 Ultra

It runs at around 15-25 FPS at 1024*768 at low to medium settings. Will the 1.2 patch make much difference.
Click to expand...

Your performance in crysis is a bit low for that card, when I had the GeCube X1950XT, I was able to play it at 1024x768 with everything on medium and was very playable, I even installed a mod that allowed to activate Very High Quality to some settings, everything was on high, except water, shader, and game effects that were on very high, and shadows on medium and it ran average at 27fps, barely playable though. You should check your videocard drivers, RAM timings or chipset driver.
Click to expand...

i think the single core cpu may be the culprit here.

EDIT: 1.2 did make a noticable performance difference when i was playing crysis, was able to bump the resolution one notch to 1440x900 while keeping about the same perf as with the 1.1 patch.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but I can play it at higher quality settings and get better performance and I have a single core CPU, we're not talking about Pentium 4 gaming performance, the Athlon 64 is a nice chip for gaming.
Click to expand...

yeah but your 3850 is quite a bit faster than the OP's x1900xtx, and the pentium M is slightly faster clock for clock too XD.
 
Originally posted by: Lithan
Crytek's engines aren't made to run games. They're made to make people go Oooooo, and/or brag about getting almost playable fps on their $2000 computer. Hell, farcry looks like ass and STILL runs slower than any game I own on Valves HL2 engine.
Click to expand...

Crytek's engines looks better than any other engine, as long as you have a system capable of running them. If you think the HL2 engine looks good, you're obviously one of the people who shouldn't try to run either of the Crytek engines.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top