Originally posted by: supafly
Sounds promising.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: supafly
Sounds promising.
You sound as gullible as the author of the story.
So then the world has changed and he's our new hero. He's fibbing.Originally posted by: Savarak
so what if he does really truly get 120mpg? It seems he does have a working car....
Total BS on this sh!tOriginally posted by: flot
Gee, there's a great example of irresponsible reporting.
Originally posted by: cjgallen
Just get a magnetic oil filter sleeve, magnetic fuel filter sleeve, and a tornado air intake. Accomplishes the same thing![]()
Originally posted by: hevnsnt
We talked about this guy about a year ago.. (about the razors)
He doesnt live to far from me, so I wrote him an email about bringing my motorcycle over and freezing the rotors and other parts to check it out.. He never wrote me back -- go figure
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
the insight can get over 120 MPG anyway, when drafting (or going down a hill, obviously). car and driver achieved this by driving theirs right behind a ford expedition. this has nothing to do with cryogenically freezing engine parts. i mean, how could that make ANY difference? last longer, maybe, but it's not going to magically get better mileage.
as someone mentioned, put down the foil hats.
And each car would cost millions of dollars. There is no conspiracy. Manufacturers sell the level of technology that their customers can afford to buy.Originally posted by: dxkj
If you took all the advances we have and put them together in one car, we could get 200 miles per gallon on a car that would run for 20 years with no maintenance.
Whats the point, car manufacturers are in bed with Big oil,.... so we are still boned.
Well... speculating that he could run leaner safer, then he would see a gain in performance along with a gain in mileage. However, at some point his leaner A/F ratios would still cross over to pre-detonation knock (the threshold of which would not be changed by the cryo-treated components) and that severely reduces performance and efficiency, in addition to being dangerous to engine internals.Originally posted by: Falloutboy
proly whats going on here is becaue of the tempured metal in the engine hes able to run the engine leaner than you would normally which means less gas used. but I highly doubt that thier is as much of a gain in performace that is being said
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
the insight can get over 120 MPG anyway, when drafting (or going down a hill, obviously). car and driver achieved this by driving theirs right behind a ford expedition. this has nothing to do with cryogenically freezing engine parts. i mean, how could that make ANY difference? last longer, maybe, but it's not going to magically get better mileage.
as someone mentioned, put down the foil hats.
I'm not tailgating, I'm drafting.
Truckers hate that, though.
- M4H
Originally posted by: Skoorb
It might make the parts a bit harder and reduce friction by some small amount, but the 120 is simply fallacious. The person who wrote the article is an idiot.Originally posted by: James3shin
I still don't understand how it improves efficiency...i can see the benefits in terms of structural strength and reduction in "wear and tear" but efficiency?
