3dmark 2006 has been very cpu limited for a long time now. It's probably not the best option to see what performance gain you have.
My advice would be to get a single decent card, than two 5850s.
I do not speak with no first hand experience. As a hobbyist benchmarker, I upload my benchmark videos raw, on Youtube. I use an external recorder to capture pure performance without wasting system resources.
Here is an example of what I am talking about (spicy wallpaper alert on all videos).
Assassin's Creed Unity 1920X1080 custom 5850 crossfire @950Mhz Q9550 @4GHz - 26fps
Assassin's Creed Unity 1920x1080 custom 7950 @1.1Ghz Q9550 @4GHz - 46fps
What I am showing here is the performance of the same system with two different gpu solutions. Same settings (low textures in order not to choke the 5850s), same game version, same cpu frequency, Windows 10 on both.
Now as you can see the 7950@1.1Ghz was 77% faster than 5850@950Mhz crossfire. The reason for that, was the extreme load put on the cpu by the crossfire itself. The Q9550 was pegged at 100% load throughout the run. I think I heard it whispering to go do something to myself!
The 5850s were running at around 60% load due to the cpu limit, so with a better cpu things could be quite better, but still the system you are using, even going to that 980BE, will not have any better IPC than the Yorkfield I was using. If you have DDR3 it could help however. I am not sure how RAM bandwidth limited Unity is. Still I was using very high clocks on everything, cpu, fsb and ram.
I have uploaded many recent 5850 crossfire videos
on my channel, in case you are interested and even more so, older ones.
You will probably find the single 5850 and 7950 counterparts with a search as well. Just a personal database I like to share.
