Here is a picture of X850 master card. Notice that it looks like most of X850 cards, but just has two DVI outs.
Originally posted by: shabby
What a ghetto voodoo2 style cable gimme a break, nvidia's solution is mucho better.
And i really hope ati improves their mobo chipsets, they perform worse then sis and via.
Originally posted by: BouZouki
Originally posted by: shabby
What a ghetto voodoo2 style cable gimme a break, nvidia's solution is mucho better.
And i really hope ati improves their mobo chipsets, they perform worse then sis and via.
Whats wrong with SIS/Via.
Via makes excellent stable chipsets.
If your speaking in terms of overclocking, then there may be some differance.
Originally posted by: shabby
Originally posted by: BouZouki
Originally posted by: shabby
What a ghetto voodoo2 style cable gimme a break, nvidia's solution is mucho better.
And i really hope ati improves their mobo chipsets, they perform worse then sis and via.
Whats wrong with SIS/Via.
Via makes excellent stable chipsets.
If your speaking in terms of overclocking, then there may be some differance.
The ati chipset performs around 10-20% slower in games compared to the top end intel/amd chipsets, thats the problem.
For their first effort at an AMD Athlon 64 chipset, we can only say we are beyond impressed with the ATI RX480/RS480 chipset. No matter how we compare the performance the ATI RX480 is competitive or a bit faster than the best Socket 939 boards we have tested at AnandTech.
Originally posted by: Creig
Originally posted by: shabby
Originally posted by: BouZouki
Originally posted by: shabby
What a ghetto voodoo2 style cable gimme a break, nvidia's solution is mucho better.
And i really hope ati improves their mobo chipsets, they perform worse then sis and via.
Whats wrong with SIS/Via.
Via makes excellent stable chipsets.
If your speaking in terms of overclocking, then there may be some differance.
The ati chipset performs around 10-20% slower in games compared to the top end intel/amd chipsets, thats the problem.
That's funny. When ATI's new RS480/RX480 chipset was reviewed on Anandtech, they had this to say about it:
For their first effort at an AMD Athlon 64 chipset, we can only say we are beyond impressed with the ATI RX480/RS480 chipset. No matter how we compare the performance the ATI RX480 is competitive or a bit faster than the best Socket 939 boards we have tested at AnandTech.
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2269&p=22
Perhaps you can tell us where your "10-20% slower" numbers are coming from?
Originally posted by: shabby
What a ghetto voodoo2 style cable gimme a break, nvidia's solution is mucho better.
And i really hope ati improves their mobo chipsets, they perform worse then sis and via.
Originally posted by: ronnn
nothing in the inquirer to encourage me to go dual graphic cards. Now a new g70 or r520 might be worth it, if they ever get released. I am still trying to figure out what a ghetto style cable means? :beer:
Super AA should also be nice for older games.Originally posted by: sandorski
Rumours are that Crossfire will work for all games without driver specific code. If so, it's going to compete well against NVidia's SLI.
Originally posted by: thegimp03
That looks pretty cool..
Originally posted by: Greenman
Originally posted by: shabby
What a ghetto voodoo2 style cable gimme a break, nvidia's solution is mucho better.
And i really hope ati improves their mobo chipsets, they perform worse then sis and via.
Thank you for that insight. Now I don't have to waste time reading reviews or comparing specs. Armed with the knowledge that ATI uses a "ghetto" connector, I can go forth and buy nVidia parts knowing that my money was well spent.
