• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

criticize my website

You're ugly, you're way too short! And your belly-button, sticks out! You're nothing but a burden to your poor mother!
 
OMG YOUR WEBSITE SUXORZ!!! NO RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA?? NO QUIZ RESULTS? NO RANDOM PIXORZ OF YOUR FRIENDS??? OMG Legend's myspace.com site is infinetely better!
 
-Layout looks very very similar to http://www.macromedia.com (the top bar, the grey/white gradient for bg, even the white website title on top of the bar, not to mention the hover effect is similar)
-The rounded corners need work, they look fuzzy in comparison
-Quite frankly it just looks like a cheap version of macromedia's site
 
"This website is best viewed in Firefox at 1024x768"...

This allways turns me off, if you cannot make a website that works equally on all browsers...and all resolutions, don't do it! No need to mention it separately.
 
Originally posted by: Chompman
Needs more animated .gifs and a hampster dance song.

And porn, gotta have the porn.

Actually it looks good for a start. I'm working on a Mambo page right now and am getting sick of .css files. Just keep out the <blink> and all's good. Where do you get your base fees for service? (out of the blue or off of BB's, etc list)
 
Originally posted by: DaFinn
"This website is best viewed in Firefox at 1024x768"...

This allways turns me off, if you cannot make a website that works equally on all browsers...and all resolutions, don't do it! No need to mention it separately.

:beer:
 
Originally posted by: Mo0o
-Layout looks very very similar to http://www.macromedia.com (the top bar, the grey/white gradient for bg, even the white website title on top of the bar, not to mention the hover effect is similar)
-The rounded corners need work, they look fuzzy in comparison
-Quite frankly it just looks like a cheap version of macromedia's site

It also reminded me of Macromedia's site as well.
 
Originally posted by: WobbleWobble
Originally posted by: Mo0o
-Layout looks very very similar to http://www.macromedia.com (the top bar, the grey/white gradient for bg, even the white website title on top of the bar, not to mention the hover effect is similar)
-The rounded corners need work, they look fuzzy in comparison
-Quite frankly it just looks like a cheap version of macromedia's site

It also reminded me of Macromedia's site as well.

not important, its a good look...those needing this stuff would never know.

Remove the "prices may seem high" deal...just the comparsion to BB is enough.

Personally I had no idea it was that high now. I know most charge $150/hr for house calls now but BB?

I am doing a HD replacement at 4 today....if she calls back with her address.

$50 for 30 mins. She reinstalls the stuff.

If I do it $25 to 50 an hour depending how entertaining the enviroment is or a problem it is.



 
I would remove that semi-resume you have on there too. If you already had a undergrad or grad degree, with a ton of experience, then I would say keep it, but it kinda looks shabby to me. And it says "he is very experienced with virus removal and spyware"...that makes it sound like your not experienced at anything else. I would get rid of that line also.
 
Originally posted by: Mo0o
-Layout looks very very similar to http://www.macromedia.com (the top bar, the grey/white gradient for bg, even the white website title on top of the bar, not to mention the hover effect is similar)
-The rounded corners need work, they look fuzzy in comparison
-Quite frankly it just looks like a cheap version of macromedia's site

mmm i just went there and saw it, i somewhat agree. w/e though.
 
Back
Top