kranky
Elite Member
I am fanatical about ethical behavior, but there's nothing wrong with using the law to defend your rights.
I don't want to derail this thread, but let's say I get a letter from XYZ Collection agency telling me to pay them $400. I might remember that I had an old outstanding bill from a local store for $200 and it might be that account. But it might NOT be. Maybe XYZ has a bunch of screwed up records and they want me to pay for someone else's debt. The law says they have to produce documentation to back up their claim, and they have to produce it if I dispute the debt. Maybe the local store I owed $200 to went out of business or simply wrote it off and I don't owe anything to anybody.
Nothing unethical about that. They should have to prove I owe the money. Why should I pay them anything just because they demand money, especially if I have never dealt with them directly? "Oh, we represent Megacorp and you owe us $400." Prove it. The law says you have to.
I don't want to derail this thread, but let's say I get a letter from XYZ Collection agency telling me to pay them $400. I might remember that I had an old outstanding bill from a local store for $200 and it might be that account. But it might NOT be. Maybe XYZ has a bunch of screwed up records and they want me to pay for someone else's debt. The law says they have to produce documentation to back up their claim, and they have to produce it if I dispute the debt. Maybe the local store I owed $200 to went out of business or simply wrote it off and I don't owe anything to anybody.
Nothing unethical about that. They should have to prove I owe the money. Why should I pay them anything just because they demand money, especially if I have never dealt with them directly? "Oh, we represent Megacorp and you owe us $400." Prove it. The law says you have to.