• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Creationist offers $10K to prove Bible wrong

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
i can prove a negative. i can prove you weren't hanging out with gary busey on tuesday night by asking gary busey if you were hanging out with him. he'll answer no. negative proven. :colbert:

Can you prove that?

😀

Seriously though, "prove"? There is a non-zero probability that the entire universe just didn't pop out of existence a microsecond complete in all forms with our "memories" coincidentally being as they are. Therefore I can't prove it didn't happen.

I may not like Dawkins, but that doesn't keep me from being annoyed with this stuff 😛
 
Can you prove that?

😀

Seriously though, "prove"? There is a non-zero probability that the entire universe just didn't pop out of existence a microsecond complete in all forms with our "memories" coincidentally being as they are. Therefore I can't prove it didn't happen.

I may not like Dawkins, but that doesn't keep me from being annoyed with this stuff 😛

What's really happening is we're all a computer simulation in some giant computer. I hope it's not a video game, they might get bored and smash us with some meteors or something. I know bad things tend to happen when I get bored with SimCity.
 
Jesus Christ on a pogo stick with a walking stick up his ass!!!!

Prove gravity wrong then. Gravity is a proven theoretical scentific fact, unless facts come along that change said theory.

Last time I trolled like this in a religion thread, I actually received an infraction.

I hope you do too. :colbert:
 
What the point in that offer?

Its not like not being able to prove the bible false means its true.

Surely the answer to "Bet you cant prove the bible is wrong" should be "So?".
 
i can prove a negative. i can prove you weren't hanging out with gary busey on tuesday night by asking gary busey if you were hanging out with him. he'll answer no. negative proven. :colbert:

How do you know he will answer no? We're talking about Gary Busey here.
 
Sorry if repost, I did search..

While I personally couldn't care less about what people believe, but I keep seeing a ton of threads where a ton of people keep saying that Creationism is proven wrong, so a challenge like this should be a cake walk.

Basically some guy is putting up $10K on a bet that you can't prove the Bible isn't fact.

http://living.msn.com/life-inspired...ost?post=56fddca5-e512-4367-b2bb-7530e3bc8006

The details...
http://creationsciencehalloffame.org/contests/literal-genesis-trial-contest/

There is one for a million dollars. This guy needs to get real.

And, btw, the qualifications are probably going to make it impossible to prove wrong. (Endlessly moving the goal posts types or just unreasonable qualifications)
 
Can you prove that?

😀

Seriously though, "prove"? There is a non-zero probability that the entire universe just didn't pop out of existence a microsecond complete in all forms with our "memories" coincidentally being as they are. Therefore I can't prove it didn't happen.

I may not like Dawkins, but that doesn't keep me from being annoyed with this stuff 😛

I can prove (with no uncertainty) that a largest prime number does not exist. Will I be collecting my million in a lump sum or in installments.
 
To bad he beat you to it...prove the Bible is wrong.....

To prove it wrong, you have to be able to discredit the facts that hold it up. Since the religious portions of The Bible have no supporting facts to back them up, what exactly are we supposed to disprove? Why do you think they keep saying that he should try to prove it first? Because it hasn't been proven.

Hell, no one can even provide a decent ontological argument that proves that the Judeo-Christian God exists. I took a philosophy course in college, and we had lots of fun going over all of those silly arguments. My professor was even an ID-proponent... yay 🙄.
 
To proved it wrong, you have to be able to discredit the facts that hold it up. Since the religious portions of The Bible have no supporting facts to back them up, what exactly are we supposed to disprove? Why do you think they keep saying that he should try to prove it first? Because it hasn't been proven.

Hell, no one can even provide a decent ontological argument that proves that the Judeo-Christian God exists. I took a philosophy course in college, and we had lots of fun going over all of those silly arguments. My professor was even an ID-proponent... yay 🙄.

There it's no such animal as a "decent ontological argument that the Christian good exists". Both the ontological argument and the transcendental argument are among the most egregious crimes of logic perpetrated on philosophy in centuries.
 
i can prove a negative. i can prove you weren't hanging out with gary busey on tuesday night by asking gary busey if you were hanging out with him. he'll answer no. negative proven. :colbert:

Well that is actually a positive because you were able to consult Gary busey which is a source of relevant info.
 
Bullshit circus show. No science is fact. It's generally accepted as true with the provision that future evidence may modify it. This is a con game, and someone of his stature shouldn't be engaging in such behavior.

Earth is not flat is pretty well established. So is earth orbiting the Sun and not the other way around.


Shouldn't it be proof enough that there are many versions of the Bible?

and that a convention was called to make an Official version?
 
Last edited:
"The Babel fish is small, yellow and leech-like, and probably the oddest thing in the Universe. It feeds on brainwave energy received not from its own carrier but from those around it. It absorbs all unconscious mental frequencies from this brainwave energy to nourish itself with. It then excretes into the mind of its carrier a telepathic matrix formed by combining the conscious thought frequencies with nerve signals picked up from the speech centers of the brain which has supplied them. The practical upshot of all this is that if you stick a Babel fish in your ear you can instantly understand anything in any form of language. The speech patterns you actually hear decode the brainwave matrix which has been fed into your mind by your Babel fish.

"Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that anything so mindbogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as the final and clinching proof of the non-existence of God.

"The argument goes something like this: 'I refuse to prove that I exist,' says God, 'for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing.'

"'But,' says Man, 'the Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't. QED.'

"'Oh dear,' says God, 'I hadn't thought of that,' and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.
 
"The Babel fish is small, yellow and leech-like, and probably the oddest thing in the Universe. It feeds on brainwave energy received not from its own carrier but from those around it. It absorbs all unconscious mental frequencies from this brainwave energy to nourish itself with. It then excretes into the mind of its carrier a telepathic matrix formed by combining the conscious thought frequencies with nerve signals picked up from the speech centers of the brain which has supplied them. The practical upshot of all this is that if you stick a Babel fish in your ear you can instantly understand anything in any form of language. The speech patterns you actually hear decode the brainwave matrix which has been fed into your mind by your Babel fish.

"Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that anything so mindbogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as the final and clinching proof of the non-existence of God.

"The argument goes something like this: 'I refuse to prove that I exist,' says God, 'for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing.'

"'But,' says Man, 'the Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't. QED.'

"'Oh dear,' says God, 'I hadn't thought of that,' and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.


But the you forgot the punch line that comes next! 😛
 
So question is... why do creationist not question the authority that is telling them not to think otherwise? I mean... not even a lil bit of doubt? Like seriously... not even question the people behind the church and their motives?

I had a pastor basically trick his people into acting like sheep, then blasted them for it. Basically said anything could be in the bible and they'd believe it. They need to actually read it for themselves, and actually think about it. Challenge it. Talk about it. Not just read some random translation of it and follow it without logic.
 
Sounds brilliant to me

He's going to get an education in science for only 10k? I paid a shit load more than that for mine.
 
Back
Top