• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

CPUZ 1.73 Benchmark Thread

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Seems like this test is pretty sensitive to RAM timings in single-threaded scores.

I'm getting like ~1550 points with RAM at 15-15-15-36 and ~1650 at 14-14-14-36, and ~1725 with 14-14-14-30 timings with my 5820K @ 4.6GHz.

I don't even see that difference in most synthetic benchmarks but I guess most aren't single threaded.
 
2014 Lenovo Carbon X1

tuK2lgP.png


i8zGbhk.png
 
alcoholbob said:
Seems like this test is pretty sensitive to RAM timings in single-threaded scores.

I'm getting like ~1550 points with RAM at 15-15-15-36 and ~1650 at 14-14-14-36, and ~1725 with 14-14-14-30 timings with my 5820K @ 4.6GHz.

I don't even see that difference in most synthetic benchmarks but I guess most aren't single threaded.
Click to expand...

Nice test, so we know now it doesnt really matter that much how fast the CPU actually is. It also explains why some CPUs that isnt even remotely close to others can still perform roughly the same.

In your case a 11.2% increase just with minimal timing changes.
 
There is probably more to get out of it as I learn what works and what doesn't, but this is my new little HTPC toy. I haven't experimented yet to see how northbridge/apu/pcie frequencies affect it's performance or how much this ram can be pushed.

4.5ghz/ddr2133
3153.JPG
 
Wasn't able to get a screenshot before but here ya go re-ran the bench on my i5 3550 @ 3.9GHz with DDR3 1600
cpuz-benchmark3.PNG
 
Last edited:
Did somebody find out, what this Bench is actually doing? It shows some jumping scores first before settling on some final result (maybe some t'put score on cold caches).

I didn't have the time yet to look at its instruction mix.
 
AtenRa said:
Is that 7700K at default or have you manually set it at 3.4GHz ??? Because my A8-7600 at 65W TDP has higher ST performance than what you got.
Click to expand...

Manually set, no turbo. You are getting an advantage from turbo, and better memory timings too. My memory timings are pretty awful at the moment, something like CAS 10 (if I were in Win10 right now I'd check to be sure, Linuxland makes it harder to check for that stuff without a reboot).
 
1796 @ 4.7 is the ST score to beat. Guskline almost cracked the 1800.
I threw in the towel on the Pentium at 1761 score at 4.6 GHz not going to bother with a screenshot now. Though the test barely raises temperatures, it can be done at unstable settings.
 
TeknoBug said:
Looks like the i5 4670K is identical to the i5 6600K at same clocks, I wonder what RAM was used with the i5 6600K, DDR3? or slower DDR4?
Click to expand...
I don't think so, look at his single thread results. I'm clocked 250mhz higher and he still edges me out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top