I was having a discussion with someone else about CPU scaling with the XTX at another forum. The other guy claimed CPU speed (e.g. P4 3.6 vs AMD X2 4400+@2.7 GHz) made no difference as long as the settings in a game were turned up to high. He supported his statement by linking to benchmarks done by XBit that did CPU scaling only they used a 7800 GT. My contention was that newer cards like the 512 GTX and X1900 XTX are not the bottlenecks but rather the CPU so the XBit results with the 7800 GT didn't apply for high end cards.
While I didn't have a P4 to compare, what I did instead is just compare the differences I got with my CPU at stock vs. overclocked to 2.7 GHz. Admittedly in FEAR the difference wasn't very big (shader intensive) but it did make a pretty sizeable difference in the X3 Demo. I decided to use game test 2 for the X3 Demo since it had a lot of action going on. I plan to do some tests with BF2 later on as well once I get a recorded demo. Anyhow, take a look: http://www.clan786.com/files/benchmarks/
Would like peoples thoughts on this and whether or not you think the CPU speed matters when coupled with high end cards. Keep in mind this isn't a discussion about price vs. performance, just fast CPU + high end card vs slower CPU + high end card.
While I didn't have a P4 to compare, what I did instead is just compare the differences I got with my CPU at stock vs. overclocked to 2.7 GHz. Admittedly in FEAR the difference wasn't very big (shader intensive) but it did make a pretty sizeable difference in the X3 Demo. I decided to use game test 2 for the X3 Demo since it had a lot of action going on. I plan to do some tests with BF2 later on as well once I get a recorded demo. Anyhow, take a look: http://www.clan786.com/files/benchmarks/
Would like peoples thoughts on this and whether or not you think the CPU speed matters when coupled with high end cards. Keep in mind this isn't a discussion about price vs. performance, just fast CPU + high end card vs slower CPU + high end card.
