Cpu comparison question?

jediphx

Platinum Member
Oct 4, 2000
2,270
1
81
well i have a athlon xp 2600+ mobile that does 2.5ghz, i got my hands on a celery D 340 2.93ghz processor and was wondering if it would be a decent upgrade
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,580
10,216
126
Is it the celeron D 430, or 340, you are talking about? The 430 is a Conroe-L, and should blow away the Athlon XP. The 340, I have no idea. Probably about the same or slower.
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Originally posted by: lyssword
http://www.behardware.com/arti...s-intel-celeron-d.html
your athlon xp oc'd to 2500ghz is at least equal to a64 3000 or a64 3200+.
Obviously celeron D would be a step backward. But if you are encoding media, celeron might be stronger.

That's correct. As a matter of fact, I read a review about 4 years ago, from that Australian hardware review site (the most popular one, it's name escapes me), and in this review of an FX-51 or FX-53, they had the 3.4 Ghz P4 Extreme and a 2.5 Ghz XP-M as comparisons. The 2.5 Ghz XP-M beat the 3.4 Ghz P4 Extreme at everythng they tested, except media encoding and a couple of office apps. So, unless that Celeron has 1GB of L2 cache and 2 GB of L3 cache, it's gonna be considerably slower, especially since it's running 500 Mhz less clock speed.

Originally posted by: VirtualLarryIs it the celeron D 430, or 340, you are talking about? The 430 is a Conroe-L, and should blow away the Athlon XP. The 340, I have no idea. Probably about the same or slower.

The Celeron 430 is 1.8 Ghz, so it's obviously the Preshot-based 2.93 Ghz Celeron 340.