• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

cpu backdoor within a intel cpu?

boozzer said:
so it is true? 100%? this could make my next cpu upgrade amd. or does amd also got something like that?
Click to expand...

AMD calls their system PSP (Platform security Processor). It's an ARM chip rather than an ARC chip, and they have the same function.
 
jhu said:
All computers have something similar. It's not just an Intel thing.
Click to expand...

Most ARM parts don't (although AMD's Seattle ARM does.) POWER doesn't. I don't think SPARC does. AMD didn't until very recently; neither Kaveri nor Vishera has an equivalent to the Management Engine, although Mullins and Carrizo do.
 
SarahKerrigan said:
Most ARM parts don't (although AMD's Seattle ARM does.) POWER doesn't. I don't think SPARC does. AMD didn't until very recently; neither Kaveri nor Vishera has an equivalent to the Management Engine, although Mullins and Carrizo do.
Click to expand...

While most ARM devices don't have a separate processor for such things, it is also true that there are a large chunk of ARM devices in the form of phones. And phones have radio firmware that also has access to everything.

POWER and SPARC are rather irrelevant in the consumer space.
 
AFAIK this was mandated on all x86 chips made in the US after 2015. AMD just recently started using a similar system. This is probably a big reason why the chinese have gone so quickly to domestic semiconductor manufacturing and design.


How would we stop thought crime if the NSA had to go get a warrant every time they wanted to search your computer?


Edit: Also a huge reason why Apple is now building its own servers from the ground up, and why apple refuses to merge OS X and iOS. How can you have OS security when your CPU, memory and nic are all under control of whomever has the password to the ME?
 
Last edited:
FIVR said:
AFAIK this was mandated on all x86 chips made in the US after 2015. AMD just recently started using a similar system. This is probably a big reason why the chinese have gone so quickly to domestic semiconductor manufacturing and design.


How would we stop thought crime if the NSA had to go get a warrant every time they wanted to search your computer?


Edit: Also a huge reason why Apple is now building its own servers from the ground up, and why apple refuses to merge OS X and iOS. How can you have OS security when your CPU, memory and nic are all under control of whomever has the password to the ME?
Click to expand...
that is pretty crazy. so if I upgrade my cpu in the near future, I would have no choice in the backdoors? because all cpus would come with one? intel or amd doesn't matter?

damn.
 
Don't worry though, all the US intelligence agencies are so inundated with data they can't parse in any reasonable timeframe that they stop literally no crimes. If you're a criminal, it's all gravy. Keep crimin'




The real use for all this, is for when they find a political opponent they need to silence. Say, somebody who wants to cut the NSA budget. Log into ME. Steal data. Extort.
 
Last edited:
Reads like a bunch of tinfoil hat stuff. It is so secure that they can't break into it, but instead of taking it as a good thing that it is so tightly locked down he freaks and says it is scary. Um, why? If you can't break in, then your supposed "risk" of arbitrary code from some hacker dude is pretty much nil.
 
SparkyJJO said:
Reads like a bunch of tinfoil hat stuff. It is so secure that they can't break into it, but instead of taking it as a good thing that it is so tightly locked down he freaks and says it is scary. Um, why? If you can't break in, then your supposed "risk" of arbitrary code from some hacker dude is pretty much nil.
Click to expand...
to be honest, after snowden, all the tinfoil stuff got a 99% boost in credibility. and this isn't even tinfoil, it is right there for all of us to see.

I guess this really doesn't concern us, the small fries. only people who are in position of power or countries stand to lose over security concerns.
 
boozzer said:
to be honest, after snowden, all the tinfoil stuff got a 99% boost in credibility. and this isn't even tinfoil, it is right there for all of us to see.

I guess this really doesn't concern us, the small fries. only people who are in position of power or countries stand to lose over security concerns.
Click to expand...

If you're worried about this stuff, which was designed for enterprise remote management and fairly well documented for at least 10 years, are you also worried about your hard disk, wifi, ethernet, GPU, and CPU microcode firmware? If you are, then you should stop using computers at all. Or just keep your computer off the internet.
 
jhu said:
If you're worried about this stuff, which was designed for enterprise remote management and fairly well documented for at least 10 years, are you also worried about your hard disk, wifi, ethernet, GPU, and CPU microcode firmware? If you are, then you should stop using computers at all. Or just keep your computer off the internet.
Click to expand...

This.

Author of the article is a dumbass. He apparently thinks Huffman compression is proprietary to Intel.
 
Last edited:
jhu said:
If you're worried about this stuff, which was designed for enterprise remote management and fairly well documented for at least 10 years, are you also worried about your hard disk, wifi, ethernet, GPU, and CPU microcode firmware? If you are, then you should stop using computers at all. Or just keep your computer off the internet.
Click to expand...
I was just really surprised when I read this. I got the link to the article on reddit about the super computer in china and why they aren't using american tech.

I don't like having a backdoor to my pc. But I also realize I am way to minuscule to even warrant a peek from any of the agencies. Just another nobody.
 
SparkyJJO said:
Reads like a bunch of tinfoil hat stuff. It is so secure that they can't break into it, but instead of taking it as a good thing that it is so tightly locked down he freaks and says it is scary. Um, why? If you can't break in, then your supposed "risk" of arbitrary code from some hacker dude is pretty much nil.
Click to expand...
All that needs to break the security is a key which can be shared with other parties like the NSA. And then the ME is a general purpose cpu which has full access to every component, instead of just being a minimal microcode bug patcher. That was the main point that the article is trying to get across.

Phynaz said:
This.

Author of the article is a dumbass. He apparently thinks Huffman compression is proprietary to Intel.
Click to expand...
No. The article states that the ME code is stored in a non-standard (aka proprietary) format which has been partially decoded for some versions of ME.
 
FIVR said:
Don't worry though, all the US intelligence agencies are so inundated with data they can't parse in any reasonable timeframe that they stop literally no crimes. If you're a criminal, it's all gravy. Keep crimin'




The real use for all this, is for when they find a political opponent they need to silence. Say, somebody who wants to cut the NSA budget. Log into ME. Steal data. Extort.
Click to expand...

this.

they can only master hindsight never foresight.
 
Yea, this is old new is it not? And everyone has forgotten to mention that the author conveniently has a solution he is trying to promote for the "problem". I might be concerned about this if I were a business with a lot of proprietary information, but for the general user, not so much.
 
frozentundra123456 said:
Yea, this is old new is it not? And everyone has forgotten to mention that the author conveniently has a solution he is trying to promote for the "problem". I might be concerned about this if I were a business with a lot of proprietary information, but for the general user, not so much.
Click to expand...

AFAIK he is involved in coreboot and libreboot which are freeware/open source/libre projects. And those projects aren't a solution for the Intel ME backdoor.

boozzer said:
I was just really surprised when I read this. I got the link to the article on reddit about the super computer in china and why they aren't using american tech.

I don't like having a backdoor to my pc. But I also realize I am way to minuscule to even warrant a peek from any of the agencies. Just another nobody.
Click to expand...

This backdoor cpu thing got another look after Snowden blew the whistle in 2013. Steve Blank thinks that the NSA put the Intel backdoor thing to work after Snowden detailed how the NSA got hold of unencrypted messages - which would mean either Microsoft built-in a backdoor into Skype or the Intel ME backdoor was used.
 
SparkyJJO said:
Reads like a bunch of tinfoil hat stuff.
Click to expand...
Conspiracy is a full-time job. It's called making money and making sure people who have it get more of it and don't lose it to others, like the masses.

I have to chuckle when people talk about conspiracy as if it's rare. It's not. It's how elites are elite. Law itself is a paradigm of protecting/maintaining that privilege.

I'd just like them to deign to spend a bit more of their hordes on things like GaInAs nanowires so we can get better toys that spy on us.
 
boozzer said:
I guess this really doesn't concern us, the small fries. only people who are in position of power or countries stand to lose over security concerns.
Click to expand...
Of course it concerns us. It's just that we're going to have to be content to act as if it doesn't. Volunteers running TOR exit nodes who get harassed because of bogus accusations, for instance — that's a clear enough example of how even law-abiding citizens can get trampled on when it's politically expedient.

One can try to curtail all sorts of technological participation to evade potential unlawful harassment/retaliation but, eventually, that can come to your home to roost. It depends on how passively you use technology.

The dossiers/folders profiling can be used to keep anyone down. Maintaining privilege can sift upward or downward through the political hierarchy. Who is lobbying who?
 
jhu said:
If you're worried about this stuff, which was designed for enterprise remote management and fairly well documented for at least 10 years, are you also worried about your hard disk, wifi, ethernet, GPU, and CPU microcode firmware? If you are, then you should stop using computers at all. Or just keep your computer off the internet.
Click to expand...

1+ :thumbsup:

Phynaz said:
This.

Author of the article is a dumbass. He apparently thinks Huffman compression is proprietary to Intel.
Click to expand...

And this :thumbsup:

Drama sells, reality doesn't.
 
jhu said:
If you're worried about this stuff, which was designed for enterprise remote management and fairly well documented for at least 10 years, are you also worried about your hard disk, wifi, ethernet, GPU, and CPU microcode firmware? If you are, then you should stop using computers at all. Or just keep your computer off the internet.
Click to expand...

That is hardly the same. At all. You can audit that firmware, you cannot audit IME.
You could rape said firmware to do things behind your back. true.
IME's sole mission is to do stuff behind your back (for your own good of course, wink wink).

The fact that AMD has it too does not make it right, it makes two wrongs.

Eff that *.

http://www.slideshare.net/codeblue_jp/igor-skochinsky-enpub

(was it here someone hinted that the private keys had been seen in the wild?)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top