Originally posted by: jlbenedict
Colts are not as impressive as they were last year.
Originally posted by: slsmnaz
Originally posted by: jlbenedict
Colts are not as impressive as they were last year.
I can see how undefeated with wins @ Denver and @ NE in consecutive weeks is not impressive.
Also, point spreads have nothing to do with who Vegas thinks will win the game.
Originally posted by: slsmnaz
Originally posted by: jlbenedict
Colts are not as impressive as they were last year.
I can see how undefeated with wins @ Denver and @ NE in consecutive weeks is not impressive.
Also, point spreads have nothing to do with who Vegas thinks will win the game.
Yep... There's a lot of Texas money that goes to Vegas, and a lot of bettors simply bet on their favorite team. So the Cowboys get a lot of action and the line usually shows it.Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Cowboys are always overpriced in LV.
Not sure what you're getting at... but...Originally posted by: vi_edit
Indy has won by an average margin of victory of like 6.7 points. Two games were only by a point, two more by only a field goal.
I can see the reasoning.
Question for the gamblers because I don't know: Is it better for the "better" to have a spread of only one point or to have a spread of like 10? Is there an advantage to having such a small point margin?
Originally posted by: Gibsons
Not sure what you're getting at... but...Originally posted by: vi_edit
Indy has won by an average margin of victory of like 6.7 points. Two games were only by a point, two more by only a field goal.
I can see the reasoning.
Question for the gamblers because I don't know: Is it better for the "better" to have a spread of only one point or to have a spread of like 10? Is there an advantage to having such a small point margin?
There's an important difference at some particular spread values. i.e. giving up 2.5 points is way better than giving up 3, which is way better than giving up 3.5. While there's not at much difference in giving up say, 1 vs. 2 points. Sometimes you can "buy" a point or a half point, but only if you're not moving off of 7 or 3 point lines. I forget how that usually works exactly.
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Indy has won by an average margin of victory of like 6.7 points. Two games were only by a point, two more by only a field goal.
I can see the reasoning.
Question for the gamblers because I don't know: Is it better for the "better" to have a spread of only one point or to have a spread of like 10? Is there an advantage to having such a small point margin?
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Colts and Jags win, Titans lose. Eagles take first place.
Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
Another point most people overlook when handicaping games in Dallas is the field. Texas stadium is one of the last old school stadiums with astroturf on concrete, it is one hard brutal surface and most all the players hate it. Visiting teams that don't have much experience on similar surfaces often have a hard time. Dallas's NFC east rivals play on it often enough that it's not a huge factor in those games, but other teams are at more of a disadvantage
Originally posted by: spacejamz
The original astroturf was replaced by a new, softer turf called Real Grass back in 2002.
my company participated in a flag football tournament back in 1990 and we played on the old astroturf in Texas Stadium...that stuff was worse than 20 grit sand paper on your skin...
^^Originally posted by: meltdown75
I'm picking Dallas this week. Indy won't be perfect this year and Parcells is going to be the reason why.
Cowboys 28
Colts 20
I *almost* picked the Bills last week, but my gut feeling about this week against Dallas is even better.
Originally posted by: meltdown75
^^Originally posted by: meltdown75
I'm picking Dallas this week. Indy won't be perfect this year and Parcells is going to be the reason why.
Cowboys 28
Colts 20
I *almost* picked the Bills last week, but my gut feeling about this week against Dallas is even better.
I WANT A COOKIE
