- Apr 16, 2003
- 5,972
- 1
- 0
link
I believe they should be required to demonstrate a compelling interest in tracking anyone i.e. presenting cause to obtain a warrant. This is especially true since it becomes a virtually no cost surveillance system where they could theoretically track hundreds of people without having to justify manpower costs.
Would it be legal to track someone who drives outside of the jurisdiction of the tracking officials?
Can the tracking information be made public at a whim?
Is the converse true? Can I put tracking devices on police cars so I know where speed traps are? After all, no harm, no foul, right.
If I ever find one on one of my cars, I think I will move it to the Mayor's wife's car. Then the cops can tell the Mayor that I'm at his house all of the time.
However, I was moved to virtual paralysis when I learned that an appeals court in Wisconsin decided that police can stick a GPS-tracking device on anyone they want without getting a search warrant. Even if that person is not suspected of anything more than living, breathing and expectorating.
Which means that any information gained by sticking a secret GPS-tracking device on someone's car will only yield information that could have been gleaned through normal visual surveillance.
I believe they should be required to demonstrate a compelling interest in tracking anyone i.e. presenting cause to obtain a warrant. This is especially true since it becomes a virtually no cost surveillance system where they could theoretically track hundreds of people without having to justify manpower costs.
Would it be legal to track someone who drives outside of the jurisdiction of the tracking officials?
Can the tracking information be made public at a whim?
Is the converse true? Can I put tracking devices on police cars so I know where speed traps are? After all, no harm, no foul, right.
If I ever find one on one of my cars, I think I will move it to the Mayor's wife's car. Then the cops can tell the Mayor that I'm at his house all of the time.