If I really had to, then I would. Only driven by the love I have for my pet and desire to end their suffering. I'm talking about an accident like hit by a vehicle and suffering at the side of the road or something similar. Otherwise Id prefer the death to be administered by a vet through a lethal injection.
I have had to end an animal's suffering on my own. Not a pet but it was a baby bird. Our cat had gotten into the nest and had savaged the poor little thing. Then it lost interest in the bird and just left it to die. Bleeding and broken legs/wings. Parents had flown away and the poor chick was chirping and Im sure it was painfully dying. It killed me to do it and I was on the verge of tears but I had to. I put the bird on a flat shovel and then dropped a heavy flat rock on to it. Instant death. I pushed the remains off the shovel and into the woods.
It was a common occurrance for my parents to drown a bag of kittens in the bathtub growing up on Manitoulin Island.
1. Why?
2. Is there some sort of correlation between Manitoulin Island and kitten drowning?
3. Why?
1. Why?
2. Is there some sort of correlation between Manitoulin Island and kitten drowning?
3. Why?
It was a common occurrance for my parents to drown a bag of kittens in the bathtub growing up on Manitoulin Island.
In the absence of things that eat them, cats will outbreed most of the things they can eat. That's why you spay/neuter them.
In the old days, people just euthanized the kittens instead.
In the old days, people just euthanized the kittens instead.
Yes. That's what I said."Euthanized"? They put the whole litter in a gunny sack and threw it in a river.