Could someone help me understand FSAA and AF please? Thanks.

WyteWatt

Banned
Jun 8, 2001
6,255
0
0
Ok i was looking at the pictures of the Geforce FX and ATI 9700 pro with the FSAA and AF quality pictures. I am wondering why FSAA does not get rid of all the jaggies and only some? I do think the ATI 9700 pro FSAA and AF does look better.
 

WarSong

Golden Member
Jan 16, 2002
1,147
0
0
HardOCP says the screen shots with AA and AF on for the GFfx are not accurate because the SS is taken from the frame buffer before some image quality filters are done and outputed to the screen. Here's the link: text
 

Bopple

Member
Jan 29, 2003
39
0
0
But they also remarked on their forum that 9700 img quality still seemed better to their eyes.
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,007
126
FAA looks the best, right? The tech used by the Parhelia.
No way - it's the worst because it can only handle edges. Its only redeeming feature is that it's somewhat faster than the other methods.
 

jiffylube1024

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
7,430
0
71
Originally posted by: imtim83
Ok i was looking at the pictures of the Geforce FX and ATI 9700 pro with the FSAA and AF quality pictures. I am wondering why FSAA does not get rid of all the jaggies and only some? I do think the ATI 9700 pro FSAA and AF does look better.

I think that's only with 2X FSAA on the GF FX and the lower quality AF algorithm on the FX (which sucks). Using 4X FSAA or above and the better AF algorithm, the GF FX looks just as good.