• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Could someone help me understand FSAA and AF please? Thanks.

W

WyteWatt

Banned
Ok i was looking at the pictures of the Geforce FX and ATI 9700 pro with the FSAA and AF quality pictures. I am wondering why FSAA does not get rid of all the jaggies and only some? I do think the ATI 9700 pro FSAA and AF does look better.
 
HardOCP says the screen shots with AA and AF on for the GFfx are not accurate because the SS is taken from the frame buffer before some image quality filters are done and outputed to the screen. Here's the link: text
 
FAA looks the best, right? The tech used by the Parhelia.
Click to expand...
No way - it's the worst because it can only handle edges. Its only redeeming feature is that it's somewhat faster than the other methods.
 
Originally posted by: imtim83
Ok i was looking at the pictures of the Geforce FX and ATI 9700 pro with the FSAA and AF quality pictures. I am wondering why FSAA does not get rid of all the jaggies and only some? I do think the ATI 9700 pro FSAA and AF does look better.
Click to expand...

I think that's only with 2X FSAA on the GF FX and the lower quality AF algorithm on the FX (which sucks). Using 4X FSAA or above and the better AF algorithm, the GF FX looks just as good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top