Originally posted by: loki8481
heritic! genetically modified food rocks!
Thanks to modern science! Bet those Indians could never come up with something so brillant!
Originally posted by: loki8481
heritic! genetically modified food rocks!
Originally posted by: Pocatello
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>Mill</b></i>
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>Pocatello</b></i>
The Europeans were more advanced in term of technology, and enabled the Europeans to conquer most of the world, it doesn't mean Europeans were more civilized. The Europeans were just as greedy and bloodthirsty as any people. His statement about the Indians trying to figure which mud is edible and digging hole randomly is pretty stupid. Because people do things that may seem reasonable to some and completely wrong to others. Things like how we worship, what we do everyday, what we eat might seem completely alien and stupid to other people. That's why we should be try to learn about different culture.<hr></blockquote>
I don't see how his statement was dumb. It was hyperbolic and meant to convey an underlying message which I caught quite easily. Taking things at face value from a college professor is not the smartest thing to do. Some want to create a comedic and/or entertaining atmosphere instead of being dull and bland.<hr></blockquote>
Stupidity or funny man? That's pretty subjective, opinions are like a$$ holes, everybody has one. The most important thing is, what does his department head think about his statement, if it ever get out, that is.
Originally posted by: Mill
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>Pocatello</b></i>
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>Mill</b></i>
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>Pocatello</b></i>
The Europeans were more advanced in term of technology, and enabled the Europeans to conquer most of the world, it doesn't mean Europeans were more civilized. The Europeans were just as greedy and bloodthirsty as any people. His statement about the Indians trying to figure which mud is edible and digging hole randomly is pretty stupid. Because people do things that may seem reasonable to some and completely wrong to others. Things like how we worship, what we do everyday, what we eat might seem completely alien and stupid to other people. That's why we should be try to learn about different culture.<hr></blockquote>
I don't see how his statement was dumb. It was hyperbolic and meant to convey an underlying message which I caught quite easily. Taking things at face value from a college professor is not the smartest thing to do. Some want to create a comedic and/or entertaining atmosphere instead of being dull and bland.<hr></blockquote>
Stupidity or funny man? That's pretty subjective, opinions are like a$$ holes, everybody has one. The most important thing is, what does his department head think about his statement, if it ever get out, that is.<hr></blockquote>
Umm, at least at my school Profs are allowed to have an opinion and are given a wide latitude concerning how they present material.
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>fredtam</b></i>
You said the Indians were responsible for killing them off and that isn't true. Who estimates them at 60 million? I can't find anything. <img src="i/expressions/anim_roller.gif" border="0"><hr></blockquote>
Then you evidently suck at the internet.
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
He was lecturing about the native americans. He said something along the lines of this, slowly became ramble towards the end.
"you might be wondering why the native americans never became as advanced as we were. In part, this was due to the fact that north of mexico, the tribes in the present day US spoke well over 300 differant languages. There were no nations, they were just villages and local tribes. And while we were in europe, measuring the circumfrence of the earth in (insert some date about 2.5 thousand years ago), they were over here trying to figure out if mud was eatable and digging random holes in the ground for no reason. "
there was a native american girl sitting in front of my that seem to take large offense at this. i could see why, but i also thought it was funny in a twisted sorta way, could he get introuble for the above statement?
Originally posted by: Nik
People are offended too easily in today's culture. People as a whole need to grow the fvck up and just DEAL with things that offend them.
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
<blockquote>quote:
<hr>
First, there were simply too many buffalo. If anthropologists are correct and there was a minimum of 30 million buffalo on the Plains, it would have been impossible for the Native People to have made much impact on such a large figure.
The second reason is that the Native People knew that their survival depended on the buffalo and if they took advantage of this creature, they would pay for that greed themselves. Therefore, the buffalo was hunted but honoured by the Plains Native People. <hr></blockquote>
eh don't pretend they were enviromental angels. most of the large and now extinct mammals in america such as those kewl giant sloths, giant saber tooths and whatever were gone long before the buffalo, and because of humans.
Originally posted by: Pocatello
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>Nik</b></i>
People are offended too easily in today's culture. People as a whole need to grow the fvck up and just DEAL with things that offend them.<hr></blockquote>
Are you offended that people are easily offended?
Originally posted by: Pocatello
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>Nik</b></i>
People are offended too easily in today's culture. People as a whole need to grow the fvck up and just DEAL with things that offend them.<hr></blockquote>
Are you offended that people are easily offended?
Again....he was talking about the tribes North of what is now Mexico.Originally posted by: ReiAyanami
if he's old, he's probably tenured so they would have a tough time firing him or even censuring him. has he ever heard of the Aztecs, Incas, or Mayans?
in the timeframe that he was referencing, columbus' discovery ship was a mere fraction of a chinese junk ship: <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/graphics/2002/03/04/nexpbig.jpg
">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...03/04/nexpbig.jpg
</a>
"><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...002/03/04/nexpbig.jpg
">;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/ne...03/04/nexpbig.jpg
</a>
</a>
the thing that takes up the page is the chinese ship, the little thing in the corner is the european ship.
all empires rise and fall. china was dominant in the 1400's but is not now. rome lasted a thousand years.
i sure hope that western civ teacher doesnt think western civilization is invincible
Nice open mind you got there.Originally posted by: loki8481
Native Americans are overrated.
Senior year of college, I had to take a Native American Culture seminar, focusing mostly on Indians tribes in the North East. I walked away from the class with the knowledge that European culture and religion/mythology is far better.
One more time....he was talking about the tribes of what is now North America.Originally posted by: DrPizza
Obvious hyperbole by the professor.
Just look at the accomplishments of the Mayans, especially in mathematics and astronomy! They were predicting eclipses long before much of Europe even accepted that the Sun was in the center of the Solar System
Or, look at the accomplishments of the Aztecs...
When Cortez arrived, the Aztec capital had a population of around 200,000... far larger than any European capital.
The aztecs built quite an advanced city, including aquaducts to bring water
And, someone mentioned agriculture somewhere above... There were tons of varieties of corn and potatoes grown in central America.... varieties FAR more nutricious than our "modern more technologically advanced" corn.
I'm not saying that the Indians weren't behind Europe, but at the same time, we're judging them under the microscope of our own culture... In some aspects, I'd consider their culture (particularly their respect to the land and awareness of planning for the future) to be superior to our culture.
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
He was lecturing about the native americans. He said something along the lines of this, slowly became ramble towards the end.
"you might be wondering why the native americans never became as advanced as we were. In part, this was due to the fact that north of mexico, the tribes in the present day US spoke well over 300 differant languages. There were no nations, they were just villages and local tribes. And while we were in europe, measuring the circumfrence of the earth in (insert some date about 2.5 thousand years ago), they were over here trying to figure out if mud was eatable and digging random holes in the ground for no reason. "
there was a native american girl sitting in front of my that seem to take large offense at this. i could see why, but i also thought it was funny in a twisted sorta way, could he get introuble for the above statement?
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
Most sociolgists are afraid to back the 'most stereotypes are based on truth' movement.
Originally posted by: shinerburke
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>esun</b></i>
That wouldn't be a problem if it was a joke (which, if there really is a Native American in your class, it could have been), but if it definitely wasn't then I would say it is a problem. However, to get him in trouble for something like that is unlikely. It wasn't a very smart thing to say, either way.<hr></blockquote>
He didn't put it the best way, but what he said was essentially correct. Sorry if the Native American girl was offended...but she needs to grow some thicker skin if hearing the truth hurts her that much.
I'm really sick and tired of all the PC crap that is going on in schools these days. I'm amazed anyone can learn at all. It seems more time is spent making sure nobody is offended than than is spent making sure people learn.
Originally posted by: murphy55d
I laughed too. People are too fscking sensitive.
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>murphy55d</b></i>
I laughed too. People are too fscking sensitive.<hr></blockquote>
I agree.
Originally posted by: XietyCOM
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>Chaotic42</b></i>
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>murphy55d</b></i>
I laughed too. People are too fscking sensitive.<hr></blockquote>
I agree.<hr></blockquote>
I disagree. How would you feel if you were studying abroad and the dumbass teacher made a dumbass comment about Americans and how they digged holes for no reason? I wouldn't laugh. I'd be pissed.
Originally posted by: XietyCOM
I disagree. How would you feel if you were studying abroad and the dumbass teacher made a dumbass comment about Americans and how they digged holes for no reason? I wouldn't laugh. I'd be pissed.
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>Pocatello</b></i>
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>Nik</b></i>
People are offended too easily in today's culture. People as a whole need to grow the fvck up and just DEAL with things that offend them.<hr></blockquote>
Are you offended that people are easily offended?<hr></blockquote>
owned
/submitted to bash.org
Originally posted by: preslove
As for anyone that wants to understand why some civilizations prospered and some didn't they should REALLY read this book Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies by Jared Diamond. It's fvcking awesome.
