zsdersw
Lifer
- Oct 29, 2003
- 10,505
- 2
- 0
I totally disagree-there is no legislative difference between gutting civil service and gutting collective bargaining-all that is required is political motivation and a supermajority in both houses. I note that every time Walker raises the civil service statute argument he never ever promises he won't try to touch civil service.
I can easily see civil service becoming demonized as tenure for toll collectors, and forcing the government to carry lazy, unproductive workers and it is necessary to "reform" civil service to cut the deficit by allowing politicians to fire/demote all government workers at will. The huge increase in patronage power won't be mentioned.
It's common to believe the sky is falling. It's worth noting, though, that it never has.
