• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Correlation between income/party?

AFB

Lifer
Trying to see if there is a correlation between party income present. Vote honestly, no one will know. Pick the party that best fits you or other.



You are not required or asked to post it, just vote.

Thanks 🙂

Edit: Spellin 🙂
 
You have to increase the number of income ranges on the low end! 50G is way more than the national average of ~35G per year. Personally, I'm making about 12G before taxes working full time right now.
 
Sorry OP but the poll sucks, "liberal" and "conservative" are at the fringe of their respective parties. Hell, they don't even mean the same thing they used to. Despite the black and white nature of our times, this poll is lacking too much in gray.
 
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: TechJunkie95242
nvm

Don't be shy 🙂

I posted for my father, see I will be turning 18 on October 13 (day of 3rd pres. debate) I registered early to vote against that scumbag Bush. My father is a conservative, but he absolutely hates Bush and so I put him down for the 200k+( owns a lawfirm in Northern CA).. Heh.. not so shy now am I?🙂
 
Originally posted by: Maximilian Kolbe
Kerry=rich man, rich wife

This parasailing fool wants the "middle class" to vote for him even though he has never been there......

What an IDIOT!!


And Bush has.... :roll:
 
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Maximilian Kolbe
Kerry=rich man, rich wife

This parasailing fool wants the "middle class" to vote for him even though he has never been there......

What an IDIOT!!


And Bush has.... :roll:
Infohawk has a love child. We're all screwed!
 
Originally posted by: Maximilian Kolbe
Kerry=rich man, rich wife

This parasailing fool wants the "middle class" to vote for him even though he has never been there......

What an IDIOT!!


Uh, what politician isn't rich?

You don't think Bush is rich?
 
not all politicians are "rich". I wouldn't consider making $200,000 a year rich. After the govt rips you off and takes all the money away in taxes, you dont have that much left.
 
Bush is an arrogant asshole that took a 500 billion dollar surplus, created a 500 billion dollar deficit, paid a good chunk of that to the VP's ex-company via no-bid contracts, and continues to turn a blind eye towards his friends, the Saudis, who are solely responsible for enabling 9-11.

That constitutes him as a prick.

And it also makes you one ******, for your blind allegiance to his lack of vision and articulation.
 
So Maximilian, it seems that you have no use for the idiot nor the prick.

"But how are we supposed to see but where we should run?"
 
Originally posted by: ntdz
not all politicians are "rich". I wouldn't consider making $200,000 a year rich. After the govt rips you off and takes all the money away in taxes, you dont have that much left.

You don't consider making >200 Gs rich?!?!?! Tell me, what percentage of the population makes that much in your country? How many people that make that much have to worry about the basics?

What kind of income do you make? If you are young, what kind of income does your family make? (Rhetorical questions, I have enough residual Protestantism in my blood to be uncomfortable with the topic)

I suggest you get your head out of your ass and find out what the majority of your countrymen make. Then figure out exactly what you need. Then decide what "rich" means.

I'm not saying that it's wrong to be rich, but if you are making many times what you need for the basics, or are making many times the average income in your country, then you are rich.

There's nothing wrong with being rich, there is something wrong with denying reality.
 
Originally posted by: Kibbo
Originally posted by: ntdz
not all politicians are "rich". I wouldn't consider making $200,000 a year rich. After the govt rips you off and takes all the money away in taxes, you dont have that much left.

You don't consider making >200 Gs rich?!?!?! Tell me, what percentage of the population makes that much in your country? How many people that make that much have to worry about the basics?

What kind of income do you make? If you are young, what kind of income does your family make? (Rhetorical questions, I have enough residual Protestantism in my blood to be uncomfortable with the topic)

I suggest you get your head out of your ass and find out what the majority of your countrymen make. Then figure out exactly what you need. Then decide what "rich" means.

I'm not saying that it's wrong to be rich, but if you are making many times what you need for the basics, or are making many times the average income in your country, then you are rich.

There's nothing wrong with being rich, there is something wrong with denying reality.


About 1% of the population apparently, my father runs a lawfirm in Northern CA and his annual earning after paying employees and partner splits are around 600k+... Business has been bad lately though so I don't know what he's making this year.
 
This is such a nebulus question.

What do you mean by income? AGI? or Line 22? Or after all deductions and exclsuions? Passive income? Capital gains? How about undeclared income?

I can't answer the first part, well I would'nt anyway, but libertarian is my answer to the second.
 
Originally posted by: ntdz
not all politicians are "rich". I wouldn't consider making $200,000 a year rich. After the govt rips you off and takes all the money away in taxes, you dont have that much left.

lol...
 
Back
Top