Core Temp 0.99.4 vs Real Temp 3.00

[BTRY B 529th FA BN]

Both temperature readings reports are the same for each program. Whats up with that?

 

[skillyho]

..............

......................

.............................

 

[n7]

Looks like they decided TJMax should be 100C like CoreTemp.

* Core i7 temperature and frequency support including Turbo mode.
* NVIDIA temperature reporting with highest GPU temperature displayed in SLI mode.
* Ability to run a file or shutdown based on user defined alarm temperature.
* Updated interface with modern XP / Vista style and border in Mini Mode.
* Start Minimized Vista issues finally fixed.
* New RivaTuner plug-in support.
* Extra information on the main screen and the retirement of the toggle button.
* Switch to UNICODE for better international support.
* Adjustable GUI colors and bold System Tray font option.
* TJMax updated based on new Intel documentation and further testing.
* Calibration formula simplified.
* All new CPU Cool Down Test for a more thorough look at your sensors.
* Clock Modulation & Minimize on Close options.
* New CPU Load meter, log file headings and Distance to TJMax in the System Tray.
* 101 other improvements including initial Windows 7 Beta support.

 

[conlan]

Until rev. 3.0, Realtemp was always lower in temp readings than CoreTemp.

Now, at least on our rigs, they're nearly identical.

 

[Capt Caveman]

fwiw - Core Temp 0.99.5 came out today

 

[dguy6789]

Now all they gotta do is add a real temp or core temp tab to CPUZ and I'll be set!

 

[RallyMaster]

Originally posted by: dguy6789
Now all they gotta do is add a real temp or core temp tab to CPUZ and I'll be set!

Indeed that would work out well.

 

[Kraeoss]

use OCCT 3.0

 

[Philippart]

everest!

 

[Boobs McGee]

FWIW, Realtemp 3.00 and speedfan (yes, speedfan) are showing the same idle and load temps on my system. Speed fan is a little slower to refresh, but they are matching for the most part.