RichUK
Lifer
- Feb 14, 2005
- 10,341
- 678
- 126
Lol at his comments - "struggling to find motivation to finish his own coverage" for kabylake reviews due to all the leaks.
Some Intel execs were watching Anandtech forums, and after years and years of reading how cool an unlocked i3 would be, they finally caved in: "Fine, let them have it!"Not sure what the rationale for the 7350K might be.
Little Wabbit walks into a bakery and asks for "tiny loafs of bread". The baker apologizes and says they do not produce tiny loafs. Little Wabbit goes away with a really really sad face. Next day it comes back again, only to get the same answer. Day after day, same question, same answer, same heart melting sad face.
Ten days later, Little Wabbit enters the bakery only to be greeted by a very excited baker: "We finally have tiny loafs, freshly out of the oven!" he says. "Incredible, I'm really curious who's gonna buy them..." answers Little Wabbit.
Except that SL to KL is not a die shrink, just an improved process to allow better clockspeeds and maintain turbo longer.Still, it's good to empirically test that. Even the 65nm->45nm Core2 shrink, brough IPC increases and new opcodes, however slight.
Read his post before insulting him. He bought it to bclock overclock.You actually bought the spastic Skylake? The lowest clocked and most retarded of the bunch? Should have at least gone to the 6500 not as castrated model . . .
This i3 is pfft. Its still nothing more than an upjumped dual core pretending its a quad. Meh.
We've also seen mention of a 2c/4t Pentium KL chip, which would be the bargain bin 4t chip.
That is true to a certain extent, but the problem is the chip should have been released a few years ago. It could have had a nice run back then when games relied more on single core performance. And as you said, the price without a heatsink even, is way too high.You're all such grumpy goosesFor years people said, "give us an unlocked i3!", and now it's here you're all "meh".
I think it's a cool product, just priced wrong. Price it to compete with the unlocked AMD APUs and it will be very interesting.
And the potential if you could bclk overclock it...Looking forward to those more. Hopefully, they're $70 or less. (Yeah, I know, I can wish.)
Could make a nice go-to CPU for budget builds that don't suck too badly. Combine with an 8GB DDR4-2400 or 3000, and an H110 board with an M.2 PCI-E slot, and an Intel 600p 256GB M.2 SSD, and you'll have a budget hot-rod for desktop tasks. I might get my friend with an Athlon II X4 a rig like that. I think that it would surprise him. (The performance, I mean.)
You're all such grumpy goosesFor years people said, "give us an unlocked i3!", and now it's here you're all "meh".
Does the A12-9800 have the throttling troubles we've seen with AMD APUs?It would still be slower than IGP in A12-9800. Though CPU part would be faster than 2 excavator moduls with only 2MB chache.
"Retarded" ... LOL. It's a freaking Skylake quad-core. And with BCLK OC ability, the stock speed doesn't matter, except possibly for binning. Most Skylake CPUs OC to around 4.4-4.6Ghz anyways, regardless.
That OC is a hack.
It sounds like a hack, though. Are all the listed problems still present these days with the bclk overclock?I suppose you were not in to OC back in the Pentium 166 or Celeron A300 era. A Buss/FSB or BCLK OC its still an OVERCLOCK.
It sounds like a hack, though. Are all the listed problems still present these days with the bclk overclock?
